All they had to say was "where was the proof of these 3 sets of financials?" No proof, then you can't say he's guilty. MUST BE PROVEN GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. No proof = INNOCENT.
Or ... how about letting the business commercial building market determine the market value of these properties, both NOW and at the time the loans were obtained?
All they had to say was "where was the proof of these 3 sets of financials?" No proof, then you can't say he's guilty. MUST BE PROVEN GUILTY BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT. No proof = INNOCENT.
Or ... how about letting the business commercial building market determine the market value of these properties, both NOW and at the time the loans were obtained?