Feb 26 date fag by Q. It's going to be HISTORIC!
- N C S W I C Dates? -
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (33)
sorted by:
This is where I have issues with celebrating the 5- and 6-year deltas
Q says "Within the next 21 days BIG BIG BIG HAPPENINGS are going to take place."
He said this half a decade ago.
He didn't say "In five years and 21 days xyz will happen," he said "in 21 days". Five years ago. To assert that he meant in five years and 21 days simply because that's how much time has elapsed seems sort of lazy, a little too easy.
How best to reconcile what was posted with what did [or didn't] occur?
Q also stressed the importance of Delta's. They never said it was just hours and minutes. Timestamps matter. You could be right in this particular case, but there's no harm in considering these things.
No harm at all.
Also no harm in predicting that this Feb 26 will be like the last half dozen in terms of major happenings not happening.
Do major events in a war occur on a predictable time schedule?
How many times does datefagging have to produce disappointment before it's mathematically impossible? :) qeq
I think you're taking things too literally bro. The number of people waiting for a single day of happening has diminished significantly. But it's clear now, 6 years later, that the Q team operates on markers, not dates. So certain events need to occur before the next ones start.
Delta's can be used to gauge the balance of events.
Reasonable points
Agreed—people have gradually figured out that datefagging = disappointment