BREAKING: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Trump Presidential Immunity Claim in Jack Smith January 6 Case - The Great Awakening

BREAKING: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Trump Presidential Immunity Claim in Jack Smith January 6 Case (www.thegatewaypundit.com) LET'S GOOoOoooo!!!

posted 272 days ago by LakotaPride 272 days ago by LakotaPride +256 / -0

BREAKING: Supreme Court Agrees to Hear Trump Presidential Immunity Claim in Jack Smith January 6 Case | The Gateway Pundit | by ...

The US Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to hear Trump’s presidential immunity claim in Special Counsel Jack Smith’s January 6 case in Washington, DC.

40 comments

40 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (40)

sorted by:

▲ 3 ▼

– skf93 3 points 272 days ago +3 / -0

I don't know how u I feel about this argument. Won't this mean Obama, the usurper Biden, and all future presidents will get away with crimes and corruption during their tenure?

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– LakotaPride [S] 3 points 272 days ago +3 / -0

Trump will be cleared. He asked them to look in election interference as many reports came out creating PC for a investigation . On Jan 6th he stated remain law abiding and go home peacefully. This set the stage to boomerang back on those in the past. President Trump was used as bait to get them to push this and the DS fell for it.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– FractalizingIron 1 point 272 days ago +1 / -0

https://greatawakening.win/p/17sPFrw29Q/x/c/4Z8kykgIZ5Y

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q