Someone's still going to have to comb through these every single time.
I'm really against the need for AI to read long bills. If they're that long they shouldn't be voted on at all. If the average person can't read them in full in an hour or so it shouldn't be even brought up for debate.
I could see this opening the door to massive bills that AI reads and summarizes into a few hours of reading.. but it skips key pieces (either programmed after elon dies, programmed without his knowledge to skip), and everyone votes on the bill that has a clause 'everyone will willfully be enslaved when this is passed'
That's just a different degree of bad, though. You should be able to judge bills by the content, and deciding to judge based on title is just another form of blind trust.
I'm just going to say: Don't blindly trust it
Someone's still going to have to comb through these every single time.
I'm really against the need for AI to read long bills. If they're that long they shouldn't be voted on at all. If the average person can't read them in full in an hour or so it shouldn't be even brought up for debate.
I could see this opening the door to massive bills that AI reads and summarizes into a few hours of reading.. but it skips key pieces (either programmed after elon dies, programmed without his knowledge to skip), and everyone votes on the bill that has a clause 'everyone will willfully be enslaved when this is passed'
I'm all for this. Do any of us, at this point, blindly trust? If the AI points out something we can read it ourselves.
Right now I judge by the bill's title. If it says one thing, it means the opposite.
That's just a different degree of bad, though. You should be able to judge bills by the content, and deciding to judge based on title is just another form of blind trust.