Your goal as a moderator on this site is to ensure the best user experience. In our best interest, we can agree that we desire freedom of speech and the freedom to discuss whatever topics we deem necessary to the Great Awakening.
When us anons here are discontent with your moderation policies, it is of your best interest, and the best interest of the board, to reconsider your practices. Whether you disagree with the nature of the content, the source of the content, or the relevancy to Q or the Great Awakening (to a reasonable degree,) you should not be so quick to remove topics of discussion.
Thank you.
From the varying topics on here that I never even read I think they allow a pretty wide berth. I've raised my eyebrows in the past but if I'm honest it has been pretty liberal in the true sense of the word.
I'm saying nothing...
That's how they win...
Yep, they have the power and they let you know it. I've lost count how many times I've been banned.
I'm skimming your mod notes and we've lost track of how many times you deserved to be "vacation'd" and weren't.
We make notes on most everything we see, even if it's not ban worthy. That way, whatever mod that see a stray BS comment can see the 'history' of what the mod team collectively noticed about that user.
Almost every frog has a note; sometimes it just says, "Seriously knows the Q drops" or whatever. It's not always negative.
Every frog needs to go outside now and then. It's not a big deal. The frogs that get perma-banned are the ones that endure the process without evolving off the things that get them touched in the first place.