Pascal Najadi...
Burst on the Scene in late 2023, reportedly "son of WEF co-founder", "former Swiss Airforce Commander" and "investment Banker", Najadi has been saying a lot of things about certain people and making some big pronouncements and "disclosures".
Let's take a look at him from the angle of his own actions.
From his truth social account, he links to various stories quoting or publishing himself.
For example:
https://truthsocial.com/@najadi4justice/posts/111936615383970524
https://hindustanherald.com/unraveling-operation-storm-pascal-najadis-revelations-and-global-impact/
But who wrote' the article Under who's name is it published)?
Author: https://hindustanherald.com/author/heralddesk/
No name, no variable information or data. Curious.
Who is the Hindustan Herald? Part of the Mavilach Group, apparently.
https://hindustanherald.com/ (Bottom of page)
Who are the Mavilach Group?
Mavilach Group (https://mavilach.org/)
Let’s see. Who are they? Let's check out the About Us page.
https://mavilach.org/about-us/
Hmmm…. OK.
See All divisions >> https://mavilach.org/service/ >> https://mavilach.org/about-us/
Uh? Ok.
Mavilach Press (Explore) >> https://mavilach.org/service/ >> https://mavilach.org/about-us/
Huh?
Mavilach Experience (Explore) >> https://mavilach.org/service
Mavilach Connect (Explore) >> https://mavilach.org/service
Mavilach Media (Explore) >> https://mavilach.org/service
Mavilach Engage (Explore) >> https://mavilach.org/service
In other words, nothing. All image, no substance. Every link on About us Leads to the same Service page, which leads back to the About Us page.
Keep this in mind.
But surely Najadi is legit. He's published in lots of different places. Like the New Jersey Times, as Najadi tells us:
https://truthsocial.com/@najadi4justice/posts/111739823064047742
New Jersey Times, a generic interest and news publication that suddenly promotes the most important, Breaking News!!! Disclosure by Najadi!!
Note: Popular “this week”: (Najadi article, Dec 11 aka 3 months old, but popular “This week”)
Author? “Little Mavilach”. https://newjerseytimes.us/author/little/
Profile? No data, no verifiable information. And… Mavilach Group.
Contact? Manage your subscription?
The best way to manage your New York Times subscription is online, by visiting newjerseytimes.us/myaccount.
Did Mavilach simply copy then forget to edit the NYT template?
What’s the bet that Mavilach runs a service that lets people pay him money to publish their thing in a seemingly legitimate publication?
Marketing Sales digital media
note: same articles on Hinidustan Herald and New Jersey Times
On his Rumble ABOUT page, Najadi links “The Prenuer Magazine”
https://rumble.com/user/neutralswiss/about
An online magazine dealing with generic interest topics etc, all of a sudden posts the SAME article from Najadi but under someone else’s name….
Who are they?
https://therealpreneur.com/about-us/
No information, really. Except “We’re dedicated to providing you with…. “ and “I will keep posting more important posts on my Website for all of you” but not even a name. Also, no address, no information whatsoever.
Let’s domain search:
https://lookup.icann.org/en/lookup
Registrant: Swagger Deevs
Email: [email protected]
Mailing Address: Uttar Pradesh, India.
Hmmm…. Who/what is Swagger deevs? https://therealpreneur.com/business/introducing-swagger-deevs-elevating-your-digital-presence/
In the dynamic landscape of digital marketing, staying ahead requires more than just a strategy — it demands a unique blend of creativity, innovation, and strategic thinking. This is where SWAGGER DEEVS steps in, a pioneering digital marketing agency founded by Divyam Agarwal
So, a digital marketing company. Do you think perhaps they post articles for money on their general interests and news publications website?
Do you think its possible that Najadi and Johnson have decided to pay marketing companies operating pseudo-news and general interest websites to generate the impression that they are legit and going viral? Is it possible? What other explanation could there be for these websites to publish that content and for Najadi to promote them via his Truth Social and Rumble Accounts? Do you really think that Q, DJT and the White Hats are going to ‘disclose’ all the top secret operations information in this manner? Really?
Let’s go on.
The Real Prenuer article:
Pascal Najadi, a former Swiss Air Force commander and investment banker, began with his disclosures, which include verified proof gathered from official United States Government and Military websites.
So, the Law of War Manual (dug into and investigated by MagicEyes) and Devolution Theory (dug into and investigated by Jon Herold, aka Patel Patriot) etc, etc, are all Najadi’s disclosures? Hmmmm…
The well-known American Military Veteran Derek Johnson, who is also a trusted ally of the current President and Commander-in-Chief, Donald J. Trump, as well as General Michael Flynn and other prominent US Military Commanders, has established an unhackable Disclosure www.thedocuments.info enabling the public the world over to check and verify that Donald J. Trump is not only the current Wartime President and Commander-in-Chief of the United States, These are the unmistakable components of Disclosure that will provide you with the clarity you deserve.
How many anons can verify or provide tangible evidence that Johnson is "well-known" & “a trusted ally of the current President and Commander-in-Chief, Donald J. Trump, as well as General Michael Flynn & other prominent US Military Commanders”? Trusted by who?
Who else is promoting Najadi’s narrative?
AMG (Feb 5, 2024)
Essentially a copy/paste of Najadi’s ‘statement of disclosure’
Who ‘wrote’ this? https://amg-news.com/author/medeea/
Blurb, zero concrete or verifiable details. Avatar from Gravata.com (https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d7521495d3fea0c6bd5178d6adb0cd17?s=95&d=mm&r=g) AMG is another clickbait fake site.
“Med beds” “QFS” All the executions!!!
Apparently its all been done folks! Hey, nothing like news that is real and raw (<ahem> Real Raw News!!!!)
UPDATE 30.12.2023
All Royalties Have Either Been Removed, Arrested, Or Executed Around The World All Prime Ministers Have Either Been Removed, Arrested, Or Executed Around The World Start Looking For An Honest Conservative To Elect Prime Minister In Your Country
https://amg-news.com/author/medeea/
https://secure.gravatar.com/avatar/d7521495d3fea0c6bd5178d6adb0cd17?s=95&d=mm&r=g
Najadi also promoted this:
https://truthsocial.com/@najadi4justice/posts/111724720707724741
Apparently, “Jon s. Wilson” on Medium.com was happy to republish Najadi’s article in his own name…
Who is he?
https://jons-wilson.medium.com/
Jon S. Wilson is an American Author working with more than 100+ News Organizations
15 followers, but he works with 100+ news orgs. Wow.
Najadi promotes his own article at Los Angeles Business on his Truth Social account
https://truthsocial.com/@najadi4justice/posts/111700405987695139
The article is now deleted but… archived:
So, an online general interests and news publication suddenly publishes BREAKING Najadi disclosures!
Author: Morgan Skyler. Who is he?
Morgan Snyder is a highly respected senior correspondent for Los Angeles Magazine. With over 20 years of experience in the field of journalism, Morgan is known for his insightful reporting blah blah….
So, no verifiable details or information. But his avatar?
See also Allen Keen on Amazon (https://www.amazon.com/stores/Allan-Keen/author/B09MGDK5KY); Sam Fitz on facebook (https://www.facebook.com/thedude5823912/).
Tineye reveals its a stock photo:
https://tineye.com/search/73211debb837001171d7df35df75cfe9ccda4208?sort=crawl_date&order=asc&page=1
E.g. https://bespokeunit.com/grooming/hair/short-styles/
So what sort of magazine uses fake accounts to post generic interest news, and then a BREAKING! Big story like Pascal Najadi?
And why did Pascal Najadi link to it? Doesn’t HE know that it’s a bogus website? But, he’s the one who is disclosing all the top secret information, right?!?
Thanks to Najadi, we find another ‘article’ about him.
https://truthsocial.com/@najadi4justice/posts/111800270049513263
An online general interests and news publication (focused on music, entertainment, etc) suddenly posts BAM!!! Big Disclosure by ally of Commander In Chief Donald Trump!!!!
Who are they?
https://ventsmagazine.com/about-us/
Vents Magazine is the premier online publication for music news, entertainment, movies....
But no address, not contact details, no verifiable information.
Who ‘wrote’ the article (always using the same photos that Najadi posts on his Truth Social account)?
Author: TEDFUEL.
https://ventsmagazine.com/profile/amehta/
No information, not a blurb, not even an avatar!
Najadi is even a member of General Flynn’s Locals!!! Yes! If that isn’t clear evidence that he is legitimate and is buddies with Gen Flynn, what is?
https://truthsocial.com/@najadi4justice/posts/111812580143231155
Huff mag also published Najadi’s big article:
https://huffmag.com/category/opinion/
Huffmag, an online general interests and news publication suddenly publishing BREAKING news that is top secret!!!!! The ONE Opinion article they have and it’s THIS one. How about that?
Author: Jeff Curry
https://huffmag.com/author/digitalmanish/
Mr Curry: Previous stories all fashion, models, artists, general affairs and BAM! Big Military Operation disclosure!!!
Avatar: https://huffmag.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/istockphoto-1286810719-170667a-96x96.jpg
istockphoto. They didn’t even bother to rename the file….
https://stock.adobe.com/images/Smiling-cheerful-young-adult-african-american-ethnicity-man-looking-at-camera-st/391347204 Huffmag. No address, not even an “About” tab. Oh, but
© 2024 Huffmag. Advertising Agency .
Hmmmm…. See a pattern here?
Najadi also linked to what is clearly a bogus fake news website, touting it as evidence that his stories are all true and now going global, because the news organization is a massive, mainstream news organization, namely CNBCUSA.com.
I personally checked this. Looks like now Najadi has removed the Truth Social post, but here is the link that he provided, archived:
Author: David Stevens.
https://web.archive.org/web/20240127123246/https://cnbcusa.com/author/david-stevens/
So, previous articles are Arts, Talents, models, then BAM! Big Disclosure of Global Top Secret Operations!
Avatar: Stock photo. (courtesty of Tineyecom)
https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/bearded-man-listening-music-through-earphones-2054809910
So, how is it that supposedly Super Intel knowing ‘Former Swiss Airforce Officer’ now ‘working with Space Force’ (Semper Supra, don’t you know?) is posting links to his information, articles, and photos on what are obviously fake and/or paid-for media online publications?
The CNBCUSA.com one is particularly interesting, as it is obviously an out and out fake website. (It was taken down sometime last month, possibly prompted by the actual CNBC.com folks found out about it when one of our own anons (u/winn) contacted them to let them know that their fake news was being faked by another fake, fake news website.)
But all the other sites are dodgy as heck. And yet, Najadi unabashedly uses them, or promotes them. How is that possible?
Some pedes will say “yes, its all a disclosure operation by the White Hats and Najadi is 100% legitimate (despite taking all the credit for the work of anons over the past 7 years) and these places are being used to disclose the real truth”. The same argument came out when Real Raw News operation started up. How did that one turn out?
The other explanation is that these websites were paid by Najadi (and his backers) to publish the content and make it appear something that it isn’t. To give it power and generate apparent legitimacy.
Look how many posts there have been at GAW on Najadi and his big disclosures!
https://greatawakening.win/search?params=pascal+najadi&community=GreatAwakening
Najadi has gotten himself invited onto a lot of Alt-media influencers, and has been retweeted and promoted by quite a few who I would consider legitimate anons and researchers. But have any of them really investigated into Najadi? Or do they simply take him at face value? Or are they happy themselves to promote clickable stuff?
What do you think, anon?
Here is a video Najadi posted on his Rumbel account, 3 months ago.
Apparently Derek Johnson is not only US Military veteran (the only one to have a hit billboard song in 2020! Which is obviously a really big deal (sarc)) , but he is also a “friend of US Wartime President and CIC Donald Trump”
Najadi uses a picture of Johnson standing next to Trump as the thumbnail for the video, obviously giving the impression that somehow a photo of Johnson with Trump shows he is a great friend of Trump and his ally, too!
The articles all use the same pictures. Big on Noise...
Grandiose claims, cut and paste content from OTHER anons passed off as his own? Or Super important secret disclosure operation by Q team using Najadi and Derek Johnson?
Think about it.
How much are you saying is fake? The Law of War Manual isn't fake, and there is good evidence for Continuity of Government (servicemen's reactions to Biden, re-authorization of EO 13818). Are you saying that Johnson, et al, are just trying to amplify their popularity and garner attention by using trickery with references? Are you saying they should be referencing and giving credit to Karl's Magic Eyes digs, and Patel Patriot? Just want some clarity, not denigrating all your impressive work.
Thanks for the question!!!
I am saying that (well, drawing the conclusion) that Najadi is a grifty scumbag, and that Johnson is likewise, a self-aggrandizing poser who is claiming credit for the hard work of others.
I think that Magic Eyes LOW work is amazing from a research point of view, but I'm not convinced that all of the conclusions he reaches or that others emphasize are correct.
I think Patel Patriots work on devolution and continuity of government is brilliant, and that he pioneered the way a lot (while it looks like he took some cues from Wictor to start with). I definitely hold the conviction that CoG has taken place in some form or other, but that we don't really know a lot (as needs to be the case).
Sir Isaac Newton wrote: "If I have seen further it is by standing on the shoulders of Giants" acknowledging the work of those who came before him and laid the foundation. As anons, we are all engaged on some level in a collective work to expand awareness and understanding, revealing more and more truth by investigating and sharing. This is the way, obviously.
But some people see the Awakening as a wonderful opportunity for self-benefit, whether in terms of money, fame or influence. They exploit the work and the rest of us who invest our efforts for the own selfish gain.
I put Johnson et all in that group.
In other words, I'm saying Najadi and Johnson are fake, even if some of the content they point to isn't.
Thank you for explaining. I agree that people should cite their sources, like we do on GAW (sauce, please!). If they do, then good for them for spreading the news further. I also agree that we tend to go overboard with making tenuous connections and basing conclusions on them. It's like the days when people were applying Gematria everywhere when it wasn't delivering results.
I don't think its that simple.
Firstly, the controlled opposition often use truth crumbs to direct and divert people into new matrixes. Meds beds, QFS, JFK jnr, targeted patriots getting labeled as DS, etc.
The other thing is, for example, is "devolution theory" news? No, its a theory. If Johnson's efforts to lift himself up and take credit for the work of others inadvertently helps other people wake up, that's a plus. But if he is doing this deceptively and manipulatively, then it's a minus, because this is not just about knowing things. It's about transformation of awareness, and deception, manipulation and lies are always going to have a negative drag on people becoming more aware.
ChatGPT: The Law of War Manual is a document that outlines the legal principles and rules governing armed conflict, also known as international humanitarian law (IHL) or the law of armed conflict. It serves as a guide for military forces, policymakers, legal advisors, and others involved in the planning and conduct of military operations.
The content of a Law of War Manual typically covers a wide range of topics, including:
Principles of IHL: Fundamental principles such as distinction (between combatants and civilians), proportionality (balancing military necessity and humanitarian considerations), and necessity (limiting the use of force to what is militarily necessary).
Protection of Civilians: Rules and obligations regarding the protection of civilians, including rules on targeting, detention, and the provision of humanitarian assistance.
Treatment of Combatants: Rights and obligations of combatants, including rules on capture, detention, interrogation, and treatment of prisoners of war.
Means and Methods of Warfare: Regulations concerning the use of weapons, tactics, and strategies during armed conflict, including prohibitions on weapons of mass destruction, indiscriminate attacks, and certain methods of warfare.
Occupation and Peacekeeping: Legal framework governing the occupation of territory and the conduct of peacekeeping operations, including rules on administration, governance, and the protection of human rights.
Enforcement and Accountability: Mechanisms for enforcing compliance with IHL, including legal accountability for violations of the laws of war, prosecution of war crimes, and the role of international and national courts and tribunals.
The specific content and format of a Law of War Manual may vary depending on the country or organization that produces it. These manuals are often updated to reflect developments in international law, changes in military doctrine, and lessons learned from recent conflicts. They play a crucial role in promoting compliance with IHL and minimizing the humanitarian impact of armed conflict.
The history of the Law of War Manual traces back to the development and codification of international humanitarian law (IHL), also known as the law of armed conflict. Here's an overview of its evolution:
Early Codification Efforts: The roots of modern IHL can be found in various ancient and medieval codes of conduct, religious doctrines, and customary practices governing the conduct of warfare. These included principles of chivalry, religious injunctions, and customary norms aimed at mitigating the effects of armed conflict.
Geneva Conventions: The modern framework of IHL began to take shape with the adoption of the first Geneva Convention in 1864, which established protections for wounded soldiers on the battlefield. Subsequent Geneva Conventions, adopted in 1906, 1929, and 1949, expanded protections for wounded and sick combatants, prisoners of war, and civilians during armed conflict.
Hague Conventions: The Hague Conventions of 1899 and 1907 focused on regulating the conduct of hostilities, including rules on the means and methods of warfare, protection of civilians, and treatment of prisoners of war. These conventions laid the foundation for modern rules of IHL regarding the conduct of armed conflict.
Post-World War II Developments: The atrocities committed during World War II underscored the need for comprehensive and universally applicable rules governing the conduct of armed conflict. In response, the four Geneva Conventions of 1949 were adopted, along with additional protocols addressing specific issues such as protection of victims of international and non-international armed conflicts.
Customary International Law: In addition to treaty-based instruments, customary international law, which consists of widely accepted state practices and legal principles, plays a crucial role in shaping the rules of IHL. Customary norms are reflected in state practice, judicial decisions, and the writings of legal experts.
National Law of War Manuals: Many countries have developed their own Law of War Manuals to provide guidance to military forces, legal advisors, and policymakers on the interpretation and application of IHL in the context of military operations. These manuals draw on international treaties, customary law, and national legislation to articulate the rules governing the conduct of armed conflict.
Overall, the Law of War Manual reflects the ongoing evolution of international humanitarian law and serves as a practical guide for ensuring compliance with legal obligations during times of armed conflict.
What do you suppose 13818 does?
There's been a lot of misunderstanding about that