Welcome to General Chat - GAW Community Area

Don't retract. Its a working theory that still needs to be well whetted. But a lot of factors point me towards this threory.

The Disproportionate Death of Ukrainians in the Soviet Great Famine

• First pillar of the theory is that Ukrainians suffered significantly higher mortality rate.

When harvests failed in the Soviet Union in the early 1930s, ethnic Ukrainians experienced significantly higher mortality than the majority Russian population. Andrei Markevich, Natalya Naumenko, and Nancy Qian discover in The Political-Economic Causes of the Soviet Great Famine, 1932–33 (NBER Working Paper 29089) that this was due in large part to intentionally biased economic policies of the central government.

This increase was caused by biased economic policies of the central government. So its not accidental.

They find that provinces with a greater Ukrainian population share experienced a greater increase in mortality between the pre-famine and famine years.

This pattern emerges even when controlling for factors such as weather, food production, and urbanization, as well as dekulakization — the policy of eliminating wealthy peasants who resisted collectivization of farms

The researchers suggest that the disproportionate loss of life among Ukrainians was due to economic policies implemented by Russian Bolshevik elites and directed against ethnic Ukrainian peasants.

• Second pillar is that Russian revolution was co-opted by the Khazarian Jews with Trotsky as their ideological leader, and Stalin turned against those closest to Trotsky (the original Bolsheviks) and purged the Khazarians and their influences.

Jewish connection to the Bolsheviks is well documented. Let me know if you need references for this, there have been good articles on GAW as well. What we are interested is the relative alignment of Trotsky and Stalin with regards to this.

Leon Trotsky’s Long War Against Antisemitism outlines where Trotsky was in all this. Everything he did was to push Jews to the top and squash the Christians.

Whereas Stalin is acttually accused of being Anti-Semetic. We can also see the ideology of Stalin's purges, outside of purging the Old Guard when you look at Breznev

Brezhnev's stabilization policy included ending the liberalizing reforms of Khrushchev, and clamping down on cultural freedom.[41] During the Khrushchev years, Brezhnev had supported the leader's denunciations of Stalin's arbitrary rule, the rehabilitation of many of the victims of Stalin's purges, and the cautious liberalization of Soviet intellectual and cultural policy. However, as soon as he became leader of the Soviet Union, he began to reverse this process, and developed an increasingly authoritarian and conservative attitude.

Basically the people Stalin was a conservative within the USSR (its quite a crazy notion right?) and Breznev was his follower. If you read what Krushev did, you will see the opposite. He undid a lot of Stalin's "cultural oppression" and tried to liberalize USSR, whereas Breznev clamped it back.

• The Third pillar is the Hitler and Nazi connection.

History cannot explain clearly why the Stalin broke is non-aggression treaty with Hitler and why Hitler went against Soviets while he was in the thick of battle on the western front - leading to ultimate defeat and millions more dead.

More importantly, no one can really explain why Hitler and Stalin had a secret pact before the WW2, when Hitler hated everything about Communism, and considered them to be the biggest threat and never had the expectation that the West would seriously attack him. (He even let the British forces escape after their crushing defeat early on).

However it makes perfect sense if you think of both Hitler and Stalin working together in purging the Khazarian assets - both the Commies and the Nazis - and regardless of whether they conspired to do this - is exactly what they achieved with their war. Millions of Nazis and Commies perished in that, and a lot of that devastation happened in Ukraine.

Its not a coincidence that today's Ukraine is the confluence of Nazis and Khazarians. Zelensky's Nazis funded by Kolomoyskyi's. The last two years as it played out in public in our eyes, a lot of this theory started to make sense. The only difference between then and now is that during WW2 the illusion of the division was very strong, whereas now that illusion is shattered.

Almost no one - whether on the left or the right - want to see this side of Stalin for their own reasons. The left think of everyone in Soviet Union as Communists with ideological differences. The right wants to show the millions dead in Soviet persecution as the uniform display of how bad Communism is. But the more I dig into it, the more I come to the understanding that Stalin rose up within Communism and purged it of the Khazarians, setting the stage for its collapse.

Hitler did the same thing. But in his case, the National Socialism was infiltrated and taken over by the Satanists, and when he realised the reality, he made sure that Nazis were defeated, even at his own expense.