Democrat DA Denied Ability to Vote After Someone Had Cast Ballot in Her Name - The Great Awakening

Democrat DA Denied Ability to Vote After Someone Had Cast Ballot in Her Name (www.westernjournal.com)

posted 293 days ago by LakotaPride 293 days ago by LakotaPride +30 / -0

Democrat DA Kim Ogg Denied Ability to Vote After Someone Had Cast Ballot in Her Name

A Texas district attorney found out for herself on Tuesday just how vulnerable the electon system is to misakes.

12 comments

12 comments share save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (12)

sorted by:

▲ 5 ▼

– LakotaPride [S] 5 points 293 days ago +5 / -0

A Texas district attorney found out first-hand Tuesday that elections can go very wrong.

Harris County District Attorney Kim Ogg went to the polls to vote for herself in a Democratic primary, only to be told she had already voted, which was news to her, according to KTRK-TV.

Elections officials went back in the records to learn that Ogg’s domestic partner, who shares the same address, had participated in early voting. The partner’s ballot was cast in Ogg’s name.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 3 ▼

– bigsix 3 points 293 days ago +3 / -0

Will she prosecute?

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– NeverStopBelieving 4 points 293 days ago +4 / -0

Look at the mask , with logo ! what a sicko !

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– LakotaPride [S] 1 point 293 days ago +1 / -0

Good question. I doubt she will as they keep pushing safe and secure elections DS BS.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q