Unfortunately any sort of “test” (say, multiple choice or essay) is a Mike field of bias. Even MC tests are poor at best for evaluating knowledge or skills.
No, just a random short quiz on some basics in order to cast a ballot that day, effective immediately. Voter registration requirements can be added to include more complex items, but people will have to go in person to fulfill them. This can be after the entire voter rolls are purged and we all have to re-register.
The issues with these sorts of evaluations are inherent in their design. By sitting for an exam, some will have enhanced performance, some perform the same, some (because of anxiety or other reasons) will have their performance decrease.
They possess the knowledge and skills, but having a sit down MC exam reduced their ability to recall or think critically. I don’t think that’s hard to understand. My concern is, how would anyone administer a test at that scale and not introduce biases? Haven’t even started talking about the issues with test question writers.
Every method used by modern public “education” has been shown, time and time and time again, to be the WORST methods for teaching or evaluation. Even by “scholars” and their “research” (I’m a PhD at a university - yes, I work on a ship that is sinking). Yet we continue to use those methods because … I have no idea why, unless we want to purposely ruin children.
There no evaluation of IQ or learning in a civics quiz. If you don't know who your elected representatives are or what the legislation that you're supposed to decide on works, then you shouldn't be voting. Methodological discussions about learning don't apply, this information is available outside of government indoctrination daycare centers.
On that topic, if you knew me, your know I'm a fierce proponent of home school. The Humanists funded by robber barons designed government centers to replace family and church with government and state, to prepare compliant and obedient workers for the factories (see The Why Files on YT for a great breakdown of this Rockefeller initiative) and for the "inevitable" consolidation with communism. To accomplish this of course it's necessary to do away with critical thinking and knowledge of one's natural rights, to replace facts with mutable feelings to be directed by mass media programming, etc. But that's still not impacting a plain civics quiz yet. The awake will pass it and the rest will catch up eventually.
Many of the Anons really are autistic, If they want to vote I think our Autists deserve it. Limits on who can vote when implemented beyond the constitution have historically been bad. The south used tests to limit the ex slaves, used again for years whenever the deep state could get away with it. Right now if they started limiting voters, MAGA would be at the top of the list, then Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any non government religion.
If the constitutional laws were followed there would be no problem.
Unfortunately any sort of “test” (say, multiple choice or essay) is a Mike field of bias. Even MC tests are poor at best for evaluating knowledge or skills.
What? Basic civics- what are the branches of government, who is your mayor, governor, senator, president...
No, just a random short quiz on some basics in order to cast a ballot that day, effective immediately. Voter registration requirements can be added to include more complex items, but people will have to go in person to fulfill them. This can be after the entire voter rolls are purged and we all have to re-register.
The issues with these sorts of evaluations are inherent in their design. By sitting for an exam, some will have enhanced performance, some perform the same, some (because of anxiety or other reasons) will have their performance decrease.
They possess the knowledge and skills, but having a sit down MC exam reduced their ability to recall or think critically. I don’t think that’s hard to understand. My concern is, how would anyone administer a test at that scale and not introduce biases? Haven’t even started talking about the issues with test question writers.
Every method used by modern public “education” has been shown, time and time and time again, to be the WORST methods for teaching or evaluation. Even by “scholars” and their “research” (I’m a PhD at a university - yes, I work on a ship that is sinking). Yet we continue to use those methods because … I have no idea why, unless we want to purposely ruin children.
There no evaluation of IQ or learning in a civics quiz. If you don't know who your elected representatives are or what the legislation that you're supposed to decide on works, then you shouldn't be voting. Methodological discussions about learning don't apply, this information is available outside of government indoctrination daycare centers.
On that topic, if you knew me, your know I'm a fierce proponent of home school. The Humanists funded by robber barons designed government centers to replace family and church with government and state, to prepare compliant and obedient workers for the factories (see The Why Files on YT for a great breakdown of this Rockefeller initiative) and for the "inevitable" consolidation with communism. To accomplish this of course it's necessary to do away with critical thinking and knowledge of one's natural rights, to replace facts with mutable feelings to be directed by mass media programming, etc. But that's still not impacting a plain civics quiz yet. The awake will pass it and the rest will catch up eventually.
Many of the Anons really are autistic, If they want to vote I think our Autists deserve it. Limits on who can vote when implemented beyond the constitution have historically been bad. The south used tests to limit the ex slaves, used again for years whenever the deep state could get away with it. Right now if they started limiting voters, MAGA would be at the top of the list, then Christians, Jews, Muslims, or any non government religion.
If the constitutional laws were followed there would be no problem.