One more thought regarding 9/11 and WTC
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (36)
sorted by:
They were turned to dust by an energy weapon or you are correct they would have been visible. Also the towers sat on a concrete basin in the Hudson River that would have been destroyed by that much weight collapsing on them, resulting in the flooding of downtown Manhattan
Downtown Manhattan is not below sea level! It would be possible flood subway tunnels and bridge tunnels, which DID happen, but otherwise, no flooding like was seen during the Sandy storm.
The Towers sat in a concrete basin in the Hudson river. The Basin would have been broken by that much weight falling on it. Nice that you just ignore that though
How do you break a basin which is carved into rock? You break it and make it a bigger basin? smh
Good Lord are you really this dense. The concrete is built up with the rock as a base. Nobody says the rock broke but the concrete wouldn't have stood that weight. There are seismic recordings that show the impact was way below expected. The concrete and steel was turned to dust on the way down. Lessening the impact.
Jeeeeeesus Christ, the crap I keep hearing from people who were not there.
Possibly the most stupid response ever posted. How do you know more about the cause because you were there than people who are not. Should we scrap the Jury system as they were not present during the crime?