Ill clear it up since this guy is on about the definitions. Democrats have proven to not care and change those. And they play loose ajd fast with what people call "evidence".
It is not outside the realm of reality to see them claim that a person who has 20% stock in a company IS in bed with those countries and try to take the app down. Irs also in the Democrat wheelhouse to simply add more countries to the foreign adversary list or create a separate list and repoint this to the new list whenever they want.
In short. Theycan claim without proof, that say....Trump is influenced by china. Proove nothing. Have judges back them. And take Truth social down. Or say that Musk is too friendly with China and take X down.
The real issue is how its defined and how the benchmarks are defined in completely separate docs and it does not define in any way what constitutes proof and who has to prove it.
Ill clear it up since this guy is on about the definitions. Democrats have proven to not care and change those. And they play loose ajd fast with what people call "evidence".
It is not outside the realm of reality to see them claim that a person who has 20% stock in a company IS in bed with those countries and try to take the app down. Irs also in the Democrat wheelhouse to simply add more countries to the foreign adversary list or create a separate list and repoint this to the new list whenever they want.
In short. Theycan claim without proof, that say....Trump is influenced by china. Proove nothing. Have judges back them. And take Truth social down. Or say that Musk is too friendly with China and take X down.
The real issue is how its defined and how the benchmarks are defined in completely separate docs and it does not define in any way what constitutes proof and who has to prove it.