👹⚖️🏛 BREAKING: Georgia Judge McAfee Rules Fani Willis Can Continue Her Racketeering Case Against President Trump Despite Lying in Court About Her Affair 👹⚖️🏛
(www.thegatewaypundit.com)
🤢 SOMETHING SMELLS IN GA 🤢
Yep as suspected. What did that judge need to see to remove her from the case? This is corruption on full display. Anyone who watched the proceedings can see how she lied about hiring Wade, how she paid him extraordinary money especially for never having tried a case in his life. How she benefitted directly from the payment. In any rational objective court she would have been removed from the case, disbarred, jailed and fined to pay back the money she tried to launder. But not in this courtroom. Who can stomach one more minute of this charade? This pretend, two tiered justice system has got to go. These corrupt judges, DAs and their handlers need to face military justice immediately.
She lied but as I understand it that would be a separate trial (Georgia Senate is holding inquiries on this). Basically it wasn't for this judge to determine if she was committed perjury or should be disbarred.
It's not clear if she got a financial benefit because they exchanged money in cash.
That Wade never tried a case is obviously not ideal, but she had attempted to hire others and that's not in dispute.
Legal justice is always very slow and no one should have had the expectation that this single decision would reconcile everything.
The judge said that either Willis or Wade needed to be dismissed to prevent the appearance of impropriety. He was more concerned about the optics of the prosecution than the actual corruption on full display. To say it wasn't the judge's call to determine whether Willis lied or not is incorrect. He could have declared a mistrial based on the testimony and evidence provided. The trial optics were destroyed as soon as evidence and corroborating witnesses came forward and testified about Willis and Wade. No honest judge would expect a jury to disregard what had transpired between Willis and Wade in forming their opinion. The trial as constructed was a sham and it was the judge's duty to call it what it was and declare a mistrial.