What happened with his Supreme Court case? Why isn’t it stickied? I thought it would be huge news? I am suspended on X so can’t get in. We have a link to the video?
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (24)
sorted by:
Unfortunately, that is simply not how legal standing works.
https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/standing
Take note of point 3; speculative claims.
From what I have been able to gather, the defense asserted that the case should be dismissed because the claims that Lindell's team made- accusing the machines of being faulty (and subject to rigging) were "speculative claims."
Basically, the defense said "look, these machines are tested, and certified, they cannot be rigged impossible! Therefore Lindell is only speculating that rigging happened." The judge agreed with the defense, case dismissed. Evidence of the actual rigging was deemed too "speculative" before it even went to trial.
This new evidence proves that it is not a "speculation" to believe that the machines are in fact vulnerable. And, the machines are now proven vulnerable in specific ways that are contrary to what the defense had [erroneously/falsely] stated in the previous case.
Lindell's team was appealing the standing ruling only with this case, and it appears that they now have irrefutable proof to meet the legal standing criteria.
I like your explanation above.
It really makes now.
Interesting learning. Thank you!