I am not commenting on he/she/it. I am also appalled and disgusted by the number of men pretending to be women who have been placed in positions of power and influence. However, please do not consider the sitting posture itself as determinative!

I often have often sat that way!

Consider: the spreading of the legs is to support the elbows, with the hands down, leaning forward.

This is a natural posture, to engage with another person / other people, in conversation, being naturally (leaning forward) interested in what the other person has to say, and accepting that person AS having something to say that should be listened to! The posture conveys that in a natural way.

I worked most of my life among men and soldiers. BDUs and combat boots are not conducive to femininity. Nor should they be! Femininity has it place, but NOT as a leader of men.

Back in the 80s, I needed to relate to my troops (and the rest of the Division!), by a large majority men, from LTs, senior warrant officers, NCOs, and your basic young trooper. Femininity was not the way to connect with them and didn't even occur to me. I did connect to them.

My father was a natural communicator and I naturally adapted some of his style and mannerisms.

In the Army itself, no doubt I adapted my style and mannerisms. It is human nature.

Not everyone who spreads her legs in conversation has balls. JUST SAYING! ; )