Anecdotal evidence is typically viewed as the weakest form of evidence, but it's enough to put someone away for life and we have so much of it in regards to a secret space program. Much of that anecdotal evidence is from people with impeccable backgrounds.
That's to say nothing of more complimentary elements of evidence pointing to its existence (Financial patterns, patents, etc) along with the congressional testimony of the last 3 years on non-terrestrial materials, crash retrievals and reverse-engineering programs.
That being said, while I find Salla to be entertaining, I do not find him to be credible. He is far too credulous of his subjects. Even more troubling is his continued association with charlatans like David Wilcock and Corey Goode.
u/#q2225
Certainly has you wondering if everything Dr. Michael Salla and his whistleblowers have 'revealed' about secret space programs are truth.
And what happened in Antarctica after WW2 with Adm. Byrd.
Anecdotal evidence is typically viewed as the weakest form of evidence, but it's enough to put someone away for life and we have so much of it in regards to a secret space program. Much of that anecdotal evidence is from people with impeccable backgrounds.
That's to say nothing of more complimentary elements of evidence pointing to its existence (Financial patterns, patents, etc) along with the congressional testimony of the last 3 years on non-terrestrial materials, crash retrievals and reverse-engineering programs.
That being said, while I find Salla to be entertaining, I do not find him to be credible. He is far too credulous of his subjects. Even more troubling is his continued association with charlatans like David Wilcock and Corey Goode.