Peymon Mottahedeh - FreedomLawSchool. Paytriot or Factivist?
🧐 Research Wanted 🤔
If we can ever hope to truly win against the PTB, we must first stop paying the enemy to build our prison around us.
Offshoring our wealth and insuring our fall from within has been a longstanding and valuable talent of the elite. I look forward to a day when my children are not burdened with the odious debts of tyrants.
That said, I have heard whispers for years about the Unconstitutional nature of the Federal Income Tax, the 1984 Supreme court decision, the 16th Amendment never having been properly ratified, etc.
My fellow Autists/ANONS, would you please weigh in on whether Mr. Peymon's crusade is a cause worth promoting among the Frog Army?
Below, i link his current interview with Clayton Morris of the REDACTED podcast
Not recommended. We used to call him PAYmon.
There is a cause worth promoting here, and that is free publication of true and accurate information about the nature of the tax; sorry that it's not a Swamp Rangers priority right now or I would say more.
Truths: (1) The tax is constitutional because it is "voluntary", in the sense that those who wish not to volunteer, who do their own study, and who survive the juggernaut of attempts to dissuade them from not volunteering can get to a reasonably comfortable place of confidence they have upheld the law and dealt with the enemy appropriately. (2) I don't recall that any 1984 SCOTUS case is significant in this respect, no one case gets you out of the dilemma. (3) Bill Benson's book charging that every state whatsoever had one or more formal errors during the 16th Amendment ratification process was The Law That Never Was, except that it has no traction because everything deemed done counts as done in law. That is, we can assume it was ratified deceptively and unscrupulously, but that argument won't bring remedy because everyone has always accepted it as ratified fairly until Benson came along.
(4) (u/bubble_bursts) IRS always continues to go after "nonfilers", without any change in strategy over time, because when a nonfiler has an information return (W-2 etc.) filed against him this initiates the nexus permitting them to keep harassing until they get to file for you (since you didn't volunteer to explain the info return). I'll admit two brief periods in my life when I was a nonfiler and I was gone after until I filed. If there is any policy, it's that going after the smallest fish won't be worth it to them, but there is no guarantee you'll stay a small fish and it is not generally patriot practice to do so. Weeding through the thousands of cases of IRS manipulation and destruction of lives shows that there's not a magic bullet, and those who regard themselves as upholding the law must still deal with the full consequences of the charge that they're not. They destroyed Joe Louis.
I have previously posted crumbs here but it is necessary for each person to research the law for himself and to be convinced how to proceed in his own mind. For now, consider that, in any reasonable situation, if an information return is filed against you indicating that the money you received was wages and thus income, and you believed it was in point of fact not wages or income, the law would provide you a mechanism for providing the correct information. If you attach a W-2 to your 1040 signed under penalties of perjury, you are attesting that everything in both forms is accurate and correctly defined legally. If you have doubts about anything in either form, you should research the law until you have a clear legal position. (Having looked at Peymon at different times, I can say he is unlikely to help you find an ironclad legal position that has worked repeatedly in the past.)