Some people say the exact same thing about Paul McCartney and they are just as sure as you but he is very obviously the same person he always was. What do you think makes your opinion infallible?
Just ignore his fake moustache, different coloured eyes, different ears, his different height, different instrumental ability, sudden promotion to "band leader" and the fact that his first album was the one where they were specifically not Beatles and was funeral themed.
Just because you're fooled by these things, doesn't mean we are.
I have noticed that trying to make it a "you vs. us" thing is characteristic of replacement theory believers. You want to single the disbeliever out and apply pressure to conform to what you think. You act like your perception could not be biased.
Immutable characteristics that keep changing, lol
Some people say the exact same thing about Paul McCartney and they are just as sure as you but he is very obviously the same person he always was. What do you think makes your opinion infallible?
Just ignore his fake moustache, different coloured eyes, different ears, his different height, different instrumental ability, sudden promotion to "band leader" and the fact that his first album was the one where they were specifically not Beatles and was funeral themed.
Just because you're fooled by these things, doesn't mean we are.
I have noticed that trying to make it a "you vs. us" thing is characteristic of replacement theory believers. You want to single the disbeliever out and apply pressure to conform to what you think. You act like your perception could not be biased.
Of course I'm biased. That doesn't mean I'm wrong.
Generally you're biased to a particular view if you research it and all evidence points in that direction.
You will never actually do the research though, so I don't give a shit if you disagree.
You have to ignore the answers to all those questions. You have ignored it since way back in the old forum days haven't you?
What the fuck are you talking about?