One word questions are not super-useful. Are you stating that the folks I wrote about are projecting, or that I am projecting? Better to be clear.
But I looked at your other posts, and you're not a jackass/troll, so I will answer.
The answer is both, perhaps. Or neither. Depending upon what you mean.
I stated in my post that I was talking about the people who are atheists but also believe in a system or simulation. I did not attack "all atheists." For me, use of terms like "all", "always", "none" and "never" are equal, logically, to the atheist concept. There may be absolutes in this reality (assuming this is reality), but you and I are probably not able to know them. Or at least the use of words like this should be done with much trepidation. Just say "All Women ____" in a room of women and you'll see what I'm talking about. ;)
In my experience most people who are "atheists" are either idiotic zealots who can't think things through (if you can unequivocally know there is no Architect/Divine Watchmaker/Demiurge in this universe... doesn't that make you God?), or agnostics who don't like the term.
If there is a God, we are probably not smart enough to know Him or understand His existence. So we should not assume that He's not there. Especially if we can also see that our reality has a symmetry that is difficult to label "random" or explain. The much-profaned "Golden Ratio" is just one example, but there are very many.
This is "Schrödinger's C̶a̶t̶ God". The Heisenberg Principle as applied to God. Pascal's Wager. Kierkegaard's Leap of Faith.
projection ?
One word questions are not super-useful. Are you stating that the folks I wrote about are projecting, or that I am projecting? Better to be clear.
But I looked at your other posts, and you're not a jackass/troll, so I will answer.
The answer is both, perhaps. Or neither. Depending upon what you mean.
I stated in my post that I was talking about the people who are atheists but also believe in a system or simulation. I did not attack "all atheists." For me, use of terms like "all", "always", "none" and "never" are equal, logically, to the atheist concept. There may be absolutes in this reality (assuming this is reality), but you and I are probably not able to know them. Or at least the use of words like this should be done with much trepidation. Just say "All Women ____" in a room of women and you'll see what I'm talking about. ;)
In my experience most people who are "atheists" are either idiotic zealots who can't think things through (if you can unequivocally know there is no Architect/Divine Watchmaker/Demiurge in this universe... doesn't that make you God?), or agnostics who don't like the term.
If there is a God, we are probably not smart enough to know Him or understand His existence. So we should not assume that He's not there. Especially if we can also see that our reality has a symmetry that is difficult to label "random" or explain. The much-profaned "Golden Ratio" is just one example, but there are very many.
This is "Schrödinger's C̶a̶t̶ God". The Heisenberg Principle as applied to God. Pascal's Wager. Kierkegaard's Leap of Faith.