Monarchy isn't a Bad Thing
🤔💭 Theory 😲💡
I feel like this is an extremely unpopular opinion but I really don't think republicanism was a step forward for humanity.
Monarchy is the most intuitive form of government. People tend to take care of what they own, and politicians have no incentive to leave anything better for the next generation because they really have no stake in their country. Their legacy dies with them.
A monarchy with constitutional (and familial) checks and balances is vastly preferable to a republic where the foreign interests run free and loot the taxpayers. It's pure and much simpler. No Congress, no Supreme Court, no ridiculous sham elections. Everyone knows who's in charge and what the rules are.
I don't want to argue over the merits of Louis XVI, kings are humans like you and me, however a King in general is like God the Father, in that he is father of the nation, just as a husband is like God the Father, in that he is the father of a family. And the French revolution is 1000x worse than any bad king, just as the Bolshevik revolution was 10000000000x worse than a bad czar.
This is your First Mistake....
You don't see them as being Just another Man, you look up to them as being something special, You have a massive Flaw in your thought process when it comes to Monarchs....
ALL of them even the most Benign are despots on their very best day, and they only go downhill from there....
Now, the Bolshevik(J) ""Revolution"", wasn't a Revolution at all....
It was an Invasion by the Bolsheviks(J) and Mensheviks(J) with the express desire to destroy Russia, the Tzar Monarchy, and install Communism, and they did exactly that....
The Bolsheviks(J) Murdered off the Rightful Government of Russia, and installed Lenin(J) as the New Monarch, with a ""Committee"" as his ""wife"" so to speak, in turn they Murdered off some many Millions of Russians, and what was left were Tyrants(J) running everything....
Along came Stalin(J), who then added to the Pile of Dead Russians, all Christians, and did as any Monarch would do, once things started to run smoothly, he then Punished everyone by causing even more Death....
THOSE two are excellent examples of what a True Monarch looks like....
Those aren't monarchs, they are dictators. Dictators are not kings they are just self-serving politicians that won the game of politics through cunning and violence. The Christian Kings, not perfect, ideally should be conformed to God the Father, and were either elected or selected by accident of birth.
Christ is the King of Kings, not the President of Presidents or Secretary of Secretaries.
You obviously have no clue what ""King of Kings"" means....
It doesn't mean he VALIDATES the Kings of the Earth, he NEVER Validated any of them, in fact, his Kingdom is in the spiritual Realm, it isn't Earthly at all....
And there is Only God and Jesus who are Kings there....
Jesus and God absolutely Negate any and all Earthly Kingdoms and Powers, and I doubt that you can see or comprehend that....
In a Republic, as in Early America, the Man of the House, Married or not, was considered to be ""King of the Castle"", King in his own Home, and as a Christian, Jesus or God was His King....
In a Monarchy, there is the King, his immediate Family, his Military, His Power, and his SLAVES....
In American Republic, Everyone is Equal under the Law, but our Original Laws have been Perverted and Changed and Aberrated to such a point that they scarcely look like what they were Originally, a great loss to be sure....
Jesus King of Kings speaks to a Republic, where the Man of the House is King, and not at all to your shitty Monarchs....
America is not a Christian country (it's public governing documents), easy proof
What is the First Commandment?
What is the First Amendment?
I rest my case.
Republics and Democracies were known by Jesus and his contemporaries and well as the OT jews, but it's never mentioned in the Bible. Only Kings and Kingdoms. Even Rome is not referred to as a Republic but a Kingdom by the prophet Daniel.