1- US/NATO/Ukraine were behind the attack, in an attempt to force Putin to escalate, and drag NATO into full-scale WW3.
2- Russia were behind the attack to justify significant escalation.
3- Unknown entity carried out for unknown reasons.
Option 1 seems like the most plausible, because the West are the only ones who could possibly benefit from this situation. Putin already has all the support he needs to do whatever the hell he wants, he does not need to kill his own civilians to justify a war he is already in, fresh off an election where he got 88% of the vote.
Deep State actors are the ones who are desperate to start a global war. It solves all of their problems. They can cancel the US election, further extend their power, and the war machine keeps getting paid.
Agree. It's option 1. Their original plans went down the toilet when Trump got in their sandbox and started breaking their toys. Ever since they’ve been poking at the bear who has the atomic bombs.
The profitability of war and slavery, the lust for control, those used to be sufficient for explaining government policy that could never be resolved in a sane moral framework (sufficient in the most cursory way, though accurate). But I believe things have changed. The powers that will no longer be are in a panic. Trying to reassemble the threads of their original schemes isn't working. They know they are losing everything they ever worked for, and they would rather burn down the world to rule over the ashes than see the people they were driving toward miserable 15-minute concentration camps roaming free and prosperous. I think it will only get worse for them. They aren't just fighting against people who know the truth about them. They're fighting against God, which means they have already lost.
There are three possibilities here:
1- US/NATO/Ukraine were behind the attack, in an attempt to force Putin to escalate, and drag NATO into full-scale WW3.
2- Russia were behind the attack to justify significant escalation.
3- Unknown entity carried out for unknown reasons.
Option 1 seems like the most plausible, because the West are the only ones who could possibly benefit from this situation. Putin already has all the support he needs to do whatever the hell he wants, he does not need to kill his own civilians to justify a war he is already in, fresh off an election where he got 88% of the vote.
Deep State actors are the ones who are desperate to start a global war. It solves all of their problems. They can cancel the US election, further extend their power, and the war machine keeps getting paid.
Would they start WW3 to stop Trump? Absolutely.
Agree. It's option 1. Their original plans went down the toilet when Trump got in their sandbox and started breaking their toys. Ever since they’ve been poking at the bear who has the atomic bombs.
The profitability of war and slavery, the lust for control, those used to be sufficient for explaining government policy that could never be resolved in a sane moral framework (sufficient in the most cursory way, though accurate). But I believe things have changed. The powers that will no longer be are in a panic. Trying to reassemble the threads of their original schemes isn't working. They know they are losing everything they ever worked for, and they would rather burn down the world to rule over the ashes than see the people they were driving toward miserable 15-minute concentration camps roaming free and prosperous. I think it will only get worse for them. They aren't just fighting against people who know the truth about them. They're fighting against God, which means they have already lost.