Pretty nice summary of the problems with EVs in the story. A snippet:
The key issues with EVs are as follows.
The cost upfront is much higher.
Financing charges are higher.
They depreciate at a higher rate than internal combustion cars.
The insurance is more expensive, by at least 25 percent.
Repairs are much more expensive, if you can get them done at all, and take longer.
Tires are more expensive and don’t last as long because the car is so heavy.
Refueling is not easy and missteps here can have nightmarish consequences.
They are more likely to catch fire.
Any motor vehicle accident that impacts the battery can lead to repairs higher than the value of the car, that is totaled with so much as a scratch.
To top it all over, there is no longer any financial advantage to the driver. It now costs slightly more to charge under many conditions than to refuel with gasoline.
The novelty of driving one for a day wears off after the first day. At first they seem like the greatest thing that ever happened, like an iPhone with wheels. That’s great but then the problems crop up and people start to realize that they are fine for urban commutes with home chargers and not much else.
They make truly terrible rentals. Obviously, under rental conditions, people have to use charging stations rather than a charger in the garage. That means spending part of your vacation figuring out where to find one.
Not all are superchargers, and if it is a regular charger, you are looking at an overnight wait. If you do find a station with fast chargers, you might have to wait in line. They might not work. You waste hours doing this. And you likely have to reroute your trip even to find a station without any certainty that you will get a spot with a functioning charger.
No one wants to do this. When you rent a car, all you want is a car that goes the distance. And typically car rentals are for going some distance else you would just take a taxi or a Lyft from the airport. You might need to drive several hours. And god forbid that this takes place in cold weather because that can reduce your mileage by half. Your whole trip will be ruined.
Why in the world would anyone want to rent one of these things rather than a gas-powered car? You might be better off with a horse and carriage.
Did Hertz think of any of this before they spent $250M on a fleet? Nope. They were just doing the fashionable thing.
Not all are superchargers, and if it is a regular charger, you are looking at an overnight wait.
That was the reason I did not purchase one. If I run out of charge, there's a long wait before I can go somewhere. The forest area of the Pacific NW don't have charging stations and you are stuck.
They were always doomed to fail as they could only ever serve as short distance transport within a city, And because cars within cities was already a stupid idea to begin with, all the problems that came with that won't be solved by making all the cars bigger, heavier and a lot more prone to spontaneously explode.
Pretty nice summary of the problems with EVs in the story. A snippet:
(more)
I think they thought of all that has happened and did it anyway because...
...and all will do as told - doesn't only apply to politicians.
u/#q24
Not all are superchargers, and if it is a regular charger, you are looking at an overnight wait.
That was the reason I did not purchase one. If I run out of charge, there's a long wait before I can go somewhere. The forest area of the Pacific NW don't have charging stations and you are stuck.
Hertz drank the kool-aid. LOL
They were always doomed to fail as they could only ever serve as short distance transport within a city, And because cars within cities was already a stupid idea to begin with, all the problems that came with that won't be solved by making all the cars bigger, heavier and a lot more prone to spontaneously explode.