President Trump - "Judge Engoron has refused to obey the decision of the Appellate Division relative to the Statute of Limitations".... - The Great Awakening

President Trump - "Judge Engoron has refused to obey the decision of the Appellate Division relative to the Statute of Limitations".... (media.greatawakening.win) COURT CABAL SCUMBAGS 🤬

posted 275 days ago by purkiss80 275 days ago by purkiss80 +274 / -1

29 comments download

29 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (29)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– WHOSkiddingWhO 2 points 275 days ago +3 / -1

Today's ruling had nothing to do with the Statue of Limitations though. And the case hasn't been overturned.

Ivanka Trump got loose from the case due to the statue of limitations.

I think Trump might be talking about testimony, but I'm pretty sure none of the years affected by the statute of limitations affected the penalty.

permalink save report block reply

▲ 7 ▼

– dec3169 7 points 275 days ago +7 / -0

He didn't say the case was overturned. He said it was the 5th time in this case he was overturned. As in 5 times so far Engoron ruled on something and was ultimately overruled.

As for the statute of limitations - he was referring to when he appealed on grounds of statutes of limitation. They were going after him for stuff as far back as 2011. The appeals court said they could only go back to 2014. Engoron said he can consider evidence from 2011, and that the statute of limitations doesn't effect evidence if it's used to help prove future issues inside of the statute of limitations. It will be yet another grounds for appeal.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– WHOSkiddingWhO 1 point 275 days ago +1 / -0

He didn't say the case was overturned. He said it was the 5th time in this case he was overturned.

My sense of overturned is a big reversal, not just a clarification or narrowing. Maybe I'm wrong.

The judgment wasn't overturned. The bond was lowered. I don't think Engoron ever had anything to do with the bond.

As for the statute of limitations - he was referring to when he appealed on grounds of statutes of limitation. They were going after him for stuff as far back as 2011. The appeals court said they could only go back to 2014.

Trump said Engoron did not abide by this which is incorrect

Engoron said he can consider evidence from 2011, and that the statute of limitations doesn't effect evidence if it's used to help prove future issues inside of the statute of limitations. It will be yet another grounds for appeal.

Right pre 2014 evidence and testimony had to be connected to post 2014 charges to be allowed.

I'm pretty sure Trump tried to sue Engoron over this issue. The lawsuit was dropped with prejudice.

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q