'If one Minnesota Democrat has her way, women and those who identify as female will soon have the right to bare their assets.
As the Star Tribune reported on Sunday, Minnesota State House Rep. Samantha Sencer-Mura has proposed amending the state’s law so exposed breasts cannot be considered indecent exposure.
Sencer-Mura told the outlet that she was outraged after learning that a woman had been sentenced to 90 days in jail for going topless in public. She went on to claim the indecent exposure law is outdated given society’s “shifting understanding of gender.”
“That to me just seems really wrong,” Sencer-Mura said. “Particularly now, as we as a society are thinking differently about gender and gender identity, I think this law feels very antiquated.”
Ok idiot. Are you going to make rape legal next? Cause that's where this is going....
And this is a woman presenting this bill.....
'If one Minnesota Democrat has her way, women and those who identify as female will soon have the right to bare their assets.
As the Star Tribune reported on Sunday, Minnesota State House Rep. Samantha Sencer-Mura has proposed amending the state’s law so exposed breasts cannot be considered indecent exposure.
Sencer-Mura told the outlet that she was outraged after learning that a woman had been sentenced to 90 days in jail for going topless in public. She went on to claim the indecent exposure law is outdated given society’s “shifting understanding of gender.”
“That to me just seems really wrong,” Sencer-Mura said. “Particularly now, as we as a society are thinking differently about gender and gender identity, I think this law feels very antiquated.”
Ok idiot. Are you going to make rape legal next? Cause that's where this is going....
"women and those who identify as female"
Their Freudian slip is showing. They are admitting that "those who identify as female" are not women.
Right. I believe they call the other women what? Cis women or something??