Valid question about: Why are there peeps coming to the mike saying "It is Not TeRroRisMs?, within minutes.
Answer: Because they are trying to tamp down the conspiracy theories. Of course everyone is going to wonder what happened. And, the footage and commentary has a viral nature ATM. The whole world is watching. There are ObviO black pills in the footage, especially the long-lens telescopic view of the ship from head on, and the direction-change is foreshortened - where one can see the bizarre turn the ship made, right into the pylon. One could not be blamed, if one started thinking about the possibility of foul play.
Nice anon mention.
My comments: Even if she is hyping it up, with dubious un-named sources (apparently anons on this board hate that sh*t, but that's another story), she is reflecting a sort of collective-unconscious of intelligence-chatter that is floating about her. Those people (Bannon et al.) are not stupid, either.
Without pointing a direct finger, she rattles off some possible enemies: She mentions Death by a thousand Cuts twice, which is a Suleimani doctrine, so pointing fingers at Shia, Hezbollah, HAMAS, Houthis - and anyone capable of cyber warfare. But she also possibly blames Russia and China, or the highest bidder really, from when these easily begotten weapons came on the market, and then justifiably blames various incidents that happened during both Obama and Biden prezidensees, where valuable technology was transferred into enemy hands.
Realize that she does not say WHO it was. It could be anyone. But she is pointing out that there are many enemies. And that they are getting smarter every day.
IF it is a cyberattack, it is not just a matter of how smart the enemy is: I'd like to postulate that many garden variety regular jobbers like port officials, or captains, don't follow security protocols - case in point is the recent 1234 password used on a Zoom call by a General - to talk about military manuevers. A container-ship is far more mundane than a missile attack. Just saying.
Taken to Walmart to do what? One wonders if there is some sort of kidnap dark site in the back of Walmarts? Taken seems a rather strident word, with visuals of black-garbed men stuffing individuals into vans.
Or maybe those 'useless' sailors are sent there to get lost in a Shopping maze for hapless indivicuals to never find their way out of, sort of like the Egyptian Room in the early 90's game of Zork?
Valid question about: Why are there peeps coming to the mike saying "It is Not TeRroRisMs?, within minutes.
Answer: Because they are trying to tamp down the conspiracy theories. Of course everyone is going to wonder what happened. And, the footage and commentary has a viral nature ATM. The whole world is watching. There are ObviO black pills in the footage, especially the long-lens telescopic view of the ship from head on, and the direction-change is foreshortened - where one can see the bizarre turn the ship made, right into the pylon. One could not be blamed, if one started thinking about the possibility of foul play.
Nice anon mention.
My comments: Even if she is hyping it up, with dubious un-named sources (apparently anons on this board hate that sh*t, but that's another story), she is reflecting a sort of collective-unconscious of intelligence-chatter that is floating about her. Those people (Bannon et al.) are not stupid, either.
Without pointing a direct finger, she rattles off some possible enemies: She mentions Death by a thousand Cuts twice, which is a Suleimani doctrine, so pointing fingers at Shia, Hezbollah, HAMAS, Houthis - and anyone capable of cyber warfare. But she also possibly blames Russia and China, or the highest bidder really, from when these easily begotten weapons came on the market, and then justifiably blames various incidents that happened during both Obama and Biden prezidensees, where valuable technology was transferred into enemy hands.
Realize that she does not say WHO it was. It could be anyone. But she is pointing out that there are many enemies. And that they are getting smarter every day.
IF it is a cyberattack, it is not just a matter of how smart the enemy is: I'd like to postulate that many garden variety regular jobbers like port officials, or captains, don't follow security protocols - case in point is the recent 1234 password used on a Zoom call by a General - to talk about military manuevers. A container-ship is far more mundane than a missile attack. Just saying.
Also. I agree that DJT is our liferaft.
And now we know that the captain and crew all left the ship to go shopping at walmart before the incident...
Captain and Crew of DALI Cargo Ship Were Taken to Walmart Before Ship Crashed into Key Bridge
https://greatawakening.win/p/17siNyGQ1h/
Taken to Walmart to do what? One wonders if there is some sort of kidnap dark site in the back of Walmarts? Taken seems a rather strident word, with visuals of black-garbed men stuffing individuals into vans.
Or maybe those 'useless' sailors are sent there to get lost in a Shopping maze for hapless indivicuals to never find their way out of, sort of like the Egyptian Room in the early 90's game of Zork?
It's totally fine.