This is very good page. I have read others very similar and engineers are saying the same.
Not claiming I am smart or anything, but if you have to collapse from above and nothing was exploding from the bottom, you have to collapse floor by floor.
Bush's brother was in charge of security for the buildings...the charges were placed pre 9/11 in the elevator shafts under the guise of improvement. Demolition is the only way a building will pancake on itself and fall straight down and that is according to demolition experts...I will try to find the material I read so long ago but architects/engineers did write a book of their findings...also there is video of charges going off...it is/was ALL very interesting...
I think this is the book...will look more...there was a wonderful video interview from years ago and there have been demolition experts that have weighed in. This wasn't the first time a plane has hit a skyscraper and it wasn't the first time skyscrapers have had fires on upper floors...there were videos showing these things.
The steel structure allowed for those contingencies and the buildings did not collapse...inherent to the steel structure of the buildings. Also the steel melting was not due to engine fuel...not hot enough...rather military grade thermite used in the charges which does create temperatures hot enough to melt steel...planned, planned, planned...from A-Z...not a happenstance accident at all...
This is very good page. I have read others very similar and engineers are saying the same.
Not claiming I am smart or anything, but if you have to collapse from above and nothing was exploding from the bottom, you have to collapse floor by floor.
Bush's brother was in charge of security for the buildings...the charges were placed pre 9/11 in the elevator shafts under the guise of improvement. Demolition is the only way a building will pancake on itself and fall straight down and that is according to demolition experts...I will try to find the material I read so long ago but architects/engineers did write a book of their findings...also there is video of charges going off...it is/was ALL very interesting...
My business partner said on the video, you can see the fire even b4 the plane hits. She knew.
https://softskull.com/books/911-the-simple-facts/
I think this is the book...will look more...there was a wonderful video interview from years ago and there have been demolition experts that have weighed in. This wasn't the first time a plane has hit a skyscraper and it wasn't the first time skyscrapers have had fires on upper floors...there were videos showing these things.
The steel structure allowed for those contingencies and the buildings did not collapse...inherent to the steel structure of the buildings. Also the steel melting was not due to engine fuel...not hot enough...rather military grade thermite used in the charges which does create temperatures hot enough to melt steel...planned, planned, planned...from A-Z...not a happenstance accident at all...
Aah, yes. Thanks for pointing out this one.
Appreciate that.
University of Alaska Fairbanks engineering department did the study.
For the NIST findings or for those who know and speak the truth?
It found the official findings incorrect. (https://www.ae911truth.org/images/PDFs/UAF-Final-Report-Release-03-25-2020.pdf)