https://t.me/bioclandestine/3183
"Mayday calls were received by first responders, they were aware the ship had lost steering, and stopped incoming traffic from getting onto the bridge.
Reportedly, no civilian vehicles were on the bridge at the time of collapse. There were 8 workers filling potholes on the bridge at the time of collapse, 2 survived, 6 are unaccounted for and presumed dead.
This means that if this was a terror attack meant to kill people, it was not very effective. What kind of terrorist warns first responders to save civilians?
If the terror attack was meant to cripple American infrastructure and shipping, I95 and I895 have been implemented as alternate land routes, the port will be able to operate after the way is cleared, and supply chains have already begun diverting transportation through other ports until the Baltimore port is viable again.
GM and Ford have both said this will have “minimal impact” on their operations and have already deployed contingencies.
I know you heard lots of doom-mongering today about how this is going to cripple the United States economy, but the that’s simply not true at all. This isolated incident will be an inconvenience, but the machine will keep churning. If we see a trend of accidents like this, then I might start to worry.
If you think this ship was hacked, and the bridge was taken out intentionally… then this attack was horribly executed and didn’t accomplish much."
- Clandestine
What if Baltimore was a central hub for human trafficking and the customs there was corrupt?
Diverting the ships to other (potential less corrupt) customs might hamper their operations. Just a thought.
Something else as well, the timing seems off. As far as I can tell there was very little time between the ship veering off and hitting the bridge, seems farfetched to believe people were alerted with enough time to close the bridge.
What if the Dali was on a human trafficking run. Are any humans in those shipping containers that now have to be off-loaded?