https://jessicar.substack.com/p/dna-found-integrated-in-cancer-cell

This article by Jessica Rose about the breath-taking insanity of introducing toxic genetic changes into the bodies of billions of human beings -- without having any understanding of the long-term effects -- reminds me of similar issues with regards to Artificial Intelligence.

Nick Bostrom, in his 2014 Superintelligence: Paths, Dangers, Strategies, opines that:

Before the prospect of an intelligence explosion, we humans are like small children playing with a bomb. Such is the mismatch between the power of our plaything and the immaturity of our conduct. Superintelligence is a challenge for which we are not ready now and will not be ready for a long time. We have little idea when the detonation will occur, though if we hold the device to our ear, we can hear a faint ticking sound.

Below, an excerpt from the end of Jessica's fairly technical article:

What does all this jargon mean to real people?

Neither Kevin nor I know what the physiological implications are going to be in the human being. There’s no way to know because we’ve never done anything like this before and we have no data to compare it to from prior experiments or clinical trials.

Kevin wrote:

Small amounts of contamination can be amplified inside the cell making the current DNA regulation loop hole large enough to drive a truck through.

This doesn’t sound good to me, however.

Do you guys understand what he found though? This is exogenous, contaminating, integrating DNA, that is amplifiable in these cells. My mind goes to existing cancers in people injected with the modified mRNA products. What effect are these SNPs going to have on the cell? Are these integration events occuring on other chromosomes (other than Chr9 and Chr12)? Is there something unique about these loci that allowed the integration to ensue? Are these specific loci prone to mutation during replication or DNA repair?

This story just keeps unfolding, and it’s all because of the work of citizen scientists like Kevin and Ulrike (and many, many others). Imagine, just imagine, how we would have no knowledge of these results without them. And unlike the regulators and product pushers/designers, we are openly transparent with our findings.

For my part, I write these articles to help a broader audience understand the many aspects of wrong with regard to these products.

Final thoughts

Everything, is balance. If not for exogenous ‘imbalancers’ thrown at ‘normally-functioning’ systems, then disease and/or metabolic disorders, as we currently know them, would not be an issue. These exogenous imbalancers primarily include toxins in our environment due to mega-polluters - think changes in gene activity - epigenetics - as opposed to changes in DNA, but also include toxins that we inject, put on our skin, eat and drink. If one desired to promote health and longevity, and to prevent cancer from becoming too prolific (pun intended), one might aim to keep ROS to a minimum (avoid ‘processed/packaged/factory’ “food” and high fructose corn syrup), and avoid ‘other chemical agents’ or exogenous LNP-based RNA/DNA products.

(includes 24 references)