So if I take out a loan for my small business. And that business sells something of value. Each time they sell that item...in your eyes they are sinning. Do I understand correctly your view
No. I don't think so. Bc ur business is a distinctly different person. A soulless person.
You. It's about you. You don't loan w interest and you do not take a loan w interest.
What your company decides to do is different.
But residential real estate isn't a market like the soda market either. You can't compare the two markets bc they shouldn't b treated the same. These are homes. This is where children live. We want to make the best homes possible and that might mean a well regulated residential real estate market. W loans given by the government interest free.
So as long as you invest in a property under a business name, in your logic, its all perfectly okay. Funnily, thats what most people do when they buy properties. Not that it makes any difference for real people, but it might in your logic.
Squatting occurs bc there is no ownership. If there's no ownership there's no reason for people to care or be invested in making anything better. If you cannot protect your land was it ever really yours?
There's a distinction too in the property. For instance the lady in Queens. I doubt there's a building in Queens that would qualify as "abandoned". So I don't support that. You can't squat in something just bc someone isn't presently using it.
But if there's land not being utilized. If there's abandoned buildings .... I'm about the utility of things. And if that person squatting makes that area better bc they own it and someone is clearly not using it.
So if I take out a loan for my small business. And that business sells something of value. Each time they sell that item...in your eyes they are sinning. Do I understand correctly your view
No. I don't think so. Bc ur business is a distinctly different person. A soulless person.
You. It's about you. You don't loan w interest and you do not take a loan w interest.
What your company decides to do is different.
But residential real estate isn't a market like the soda market either. You can't compare the two markets bc they shouldn't b treated the same. These are homes. This is where children live. We want to make the best homes possible and that might mean a well regulated residential real estate market. W loans given by the government interest free.
So as long as you invest in a property under a business name, in your logic, its all perfectly okay. Funnily, thats what most people do when they buy properties. Not that it makes any difference for real people, but it might in your logic.
Ah ok I understand your view on that now. So how does this tie to squatters
Squatting occurs bc there is no ownership. If there's no ownership there's no reason for people to care or be invested in making anything better. If you cannot protect your land was it ever really yours?
There's a distinction too in the property. For instance the lady in Queens. I doubt there's a building in Queens that would qualify as "abandoned". So I don't support that. You can't squat in something just bc someone isn't presently using it. But if there's land not being utilized. If there's abandoned buildings .... I'm about the utility of things. And if that person squatting makes that area better bc they own it and someone is clearly not using it.
Ownership creates responsibility.
Ok I understand your view. Thanks for expanding. Have a blessed day. Happy Easter Eve fren. God bless