Oh my gosh, here come the proudly ignorant again crawling out from under the rocks. This guy literally got every single thing wrong.
Analogy for the uninformed: the president is not infallible, he doesn't even run the whole country, and everything he does must abide by the 'dogma' of the constitution. Corruption has allowed the resident to much power, incorrectly. But no one in the country must believe whatever he says.
The Constitution of the United States of America does not declare the President as infallible.
But Catholic dogma declares the pope infallible.
Papal infallibility is a dogma of the Catholic Church which states that, in virtue of the promise of Jesus to Peter, the Pope when he speaks ex cathedra is preserved from the possibility of error on doctrine "initially given to the apostolic Church and handed down in Scripture and tradition".
Your tangent on the president/constitution seem out of place and completely unrelated to this thread. If it was an analogy, it was a bad one.
Oh my gosh, here come the proudly ignorant again crawling out from under the rocks. This guy literally got every single thing wrong.
Analogy for the uninformed: the president is not infallible, he doesn't even run the whole country, and everything he does must abide by the 'dogma' of the constitution. Corruption has allowed the resident to much power, incorrectly. But no one in the country must believe whatever he says.
The Constitution of the United States of America does not declare the President as infallible.
But Catholic dogma declares the pope infallible.
Your tangent on the president/constitution seem out of place and completely unrelated to this thread. If it was an analogy, it was a bad one.
Thanks for proving yourself wrong, now look up what ex cathedra means. Smh.