BREAKING: Iranian consulate in Damascus destroyed by Israel (update). Is the shit about to hit the fan?
(www.timesofisrael.com)
💥 WWIII WATCH 💥
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (49)
sorted by:
But you deny the likelihood of it by claiming the attack is merely blowback from putting palestinian dogs on a leash and being unable to control them. Israel started hamas and the son of a hamas founder became israel's best friend by spying on hamas. Pretty obvious what is going on here. Israel got people to do this ridiculous james bond villain-style attack and allowed it to go on in order to create a reason to attack hamas who just so happens to hide out in critical civilian infrastructure.
One is obliged to "deny likelihood" when "likelihood" is entirely subjective. It is not even a relevant concept. What is at issue is what HAS happened, not what was "likely" to have happened. You keep on thinking "it could conceivably be so" is equivalent to "it is so."
Not obvious at all. Admiral Canaris wound up spying for the Allies. Does that mean that Hitler was an allied plant? You are a stranger to logic. And arguments over origins do not dispel the reality of the present. You really have no logical argument against my position of (1) crush Hamas, and (2) crush any co-conspirators.
Did the allied governments fund hitler's war machine? Israel is slaughtering innocent people and destroying critical infrastructure using the hamas (who they funded into existence) attack as an excuse. Considering they have perpetrated absolutely diabolical (no hyperbole) false flags blaming arabs in the past you have to be blind to think the attack was probably organic. By doing that you are voicing support to this vicious campaign against the palestinian people.
The answer to the first question is "no." Nothing "innocent" about 75% civilian approval of a Hamas government. No war crime is attached to attacking combatants, no matter where they are. Human shields are not recognized in the international law of warfare (nor should they be). You assume the proof of "false flags" where none is evident (believing it is so, doesn't make it so). There would have been no campaign if the "palestinian people" (a PR slogan) had not countenanced an act of savage genocidal terrorism during the peace of a negotiated cease-fire.