US vs. Miller (supreme Court)
(1939) tells us what arms are meant in the Second Amendment:
"These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males
physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense...
And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men
were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of
a kind in common use at the time."
US vs. Miller (supreme Court) (1939) tells us what arms are meant in the Second Amendment: "These show plainly enough that the Militia comprised all males physically capable of acting in concert for the common defense... And further, that ordinarily when called for service these men were expected to appear bearing arms supplied by themselves and of a kind in common use at the time."