If you make the claim it is certainly not anyone else's responsibility to back it up. I think it is a misinterpretation if not an outright confabulation.
You could have said that in the beginning instead of going off in the weeds on the unrelated stuff. I know about the who has been talking to you post but thanks for the reminder. I can see how you took it to mean there would be an acknowledgment by Q team members. Not sure if it is that exactly but that's ok.
If you make the claim it is certainly not anyone else's responsibility to back it up. I think it is a misinterpretation if not an outright confabulation.
Well this isn’t even the one I’m thinking of, but to counter your screenshot.
“Wait until you learn WHO HAS BEEN talking to you here.”
This classic well known post, alone, implied we should wait till WE LEARN “WHO” has been TALKING to us HERE (as in the board)
Cheqm8 fren
The rest is up to you
You could have said that in the beginning instead of going off in the weeds on the unrelated stuff. I know about the who has been talking to you post but thanks for the reminder. I can see how you took it to mean there would be an acknowledgment by Q team members. Not sure if it is that exactly but that's ok.
No I said it’s not the post I’m thinking of, I’m still firm the two I described exist. However this post is not very cryptic or any word play.
Assuming there’s no disinfo, in what other way could you interpret “wait till anons find out who has been talking here
There is only one post about less than 10 know the full picture, etc. that I recall.
"Q says Trump WILL come out in full support of his connection to Q
Eventually the team less than 10, 3 being non mill WILL reveal their full names."
So I think that is a bunch of bullshit. You should have settled for anons finding out.