Execution time for them

Of course they are.

Hang a couple, I bet the others come around real quick.

So I read the op-ed that explains this legal theory.......and it's just a theory.

https://thefederalist.com/2024/02/01/how-obamas-secrets-could-save-trump-in-his-mar-a-lago-documents-snafu/

I'm skeptical for a number of reasons.

1. The PITC documents they seek, seem to be about electronic records and keeping them out of the hands of hackers.

In October 2014, Russian hackers breached the Executive Office of the President’s (EOP) network. Months later, President Barack Obama created, via executive action, the Presidential Information Technology Committee (PITC), purportedly to protect EOP information by moving systems onto Department of Defense (DOD) servers.

The Mar a Lago documents were all paper records.

2. The Memo they point to explicitly says

This memorandum shall be implemented consistent with applicable law

which means it's not changing anything about the laws involved in the mar a lago case.

https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/the-press-office/2015/03/19/presidential-memorandum-establishing-director-white-house-information-te

3. They claim that this law is different for federal records vs presidential records. And that seems a big stretch.

The witness tampering statute’s language places liability on whoever “corruptly” “alters, destroys, mutilates, or conceals a record, document, or other object, or attempts to do so, with the intent to impair the object’s integrity or availability for use in an official proceeding.”

4. They claim there's somehow a Brady violation. This doesn't make sense because again we are dealing with PAPER records. The list of documents and evidence have been turned over to Trump.