Interesting discussion.

I am wondering: Is this consequential? And if so, in what way?

Let's assume this indeed correlates to u/#q1311.

What is being triggered? Personally, I am laughing my ass off, for it falls well within the thrust of " double meanings" exists. This "double entendre", indeed, is hillaryous, as an inside joke, and a perfect hat-tip to anons "in the know".

Being as it may, it seems to me not a very convincing argument. Merely a nice cohencidence. This brings up the question of mathematical surety of this happening.

I guess, it depends on the premise, and both premises are about control. Boundaries control the ball when playing 8-ball or snooker or billiard. It is a type of hands-off control. Another type of control, which is less hands-off but a consequence of moves and counter moves, the white ball to be played can be snookered, which means that the other party has high difficulty till impossibility to pocket ANY ball.

Related to Chess, it would presume moves that are open to the adversary, yet any move leads to the same outcome.

1. If Biden is WH controlled, it is easy to control trips, which leads to this TS posts which indicates / confirms WH-control.
2. If Biden is BH controlled (pun intended) then the appearance of the stage seems to suggest freedom of movement of the BH, whereas in essence, they have no choice.

In both cases, White Hats control leads to the same outcome. This then leads us to the question of the trip counter.

Double entendre may not have been the initial objective. Words do have meaning, and sometimes events roll around where a double meaning exists. Even humorous ones.