Not one legal connected person who identified some change in the way they do legal processes?
Not one leftist fact checker slavering to disprove Q-tards?
I actually found only one mention of it, back in 2019 I think, from ABC News, and the reporter actually proposed the ones in DC were from Mueller.
Since that didn't turn out, there hasnt been one mention in the media.
I've seen literally thousands of posts, comments, and tweets and yet not one single human has a rational explanation.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (89)
sorted by:
For the past 20-years, we've watched indicted people destroy evidence, sometimes very blatantly ("wipe the hard drive - like with a cloth?" or accidentally smashing multiple cell phones?)... and get away with it.
Since nobody knows WHO is named in the sealed indictments, or for what reasons, they continue doing crooked businesses as normal. More evidence of their crimes is gathered against them daily.
When the indictments are unsealed, you can bet the White Hats will have 100% of the evidence to prosecute each one. Now the fun begins. If you strategically unseal the indictments in a certain order, starting from the bottom up, White Hats can get the underlings to turn evidence against bosses. The higher up's won't yet know that they too are under indictment, but they will be watching their minions being indicted, and offered "deals".
By the time the big show begins, the bosses will know multiple indictments will be unsealed against them... and there are dozens of their own minions willing to testify to the boss's crimes. No escape.