So you're really arguing that computing the value of a word by substituting the letters for their numerical equivalents is different than what substituting DJT for the numerical equivalents in the base cipher is? It's part of the exact same practice.
No I'm arguing gematria, while having some similarities to an alphanumeric cipher, is different and you are using the word incorrectly.
Words have specific meanings and definitions.
Basically if we were talking about engines and you're saying gasoline and I'm saying diesel and you're trying to say the gasoline and diesel are the same, and no they are both fuels but they are significantly different and not interchangeable. If I told you to fill up the engine with diesel and you put gasoline in it it wouldn't work. Specificity matters.
Take this as an opportunity to learn, not as an opportunity to find a way to remain in disagreement.
So you're really arguing that computing the value of a word by substituting the letters for their numerical equivalents is different than what substituting DJT for the numerical equivalents in the base cipher is? It's part of the exact same practice.
No I'm arguing gematria, while having some similarities to an alphanumeric cipher, is different and you are using the word incorrectly.
Words have specific meanings and definitions.
Basically if we were talking about engines and you're saying gasoline and I'm saying diesel and you're trying to say the gasoline and diesel are the same, and no they are both fuels but they are significantly different and not interchangeable. If I told you to fill up the engine with diesel and you put gasoline in it it wouldn't work. Specificity matters.
Take this as an opportunity to learn, not as an opportunity to find a way to remain in disagreement.