The article contains information on effective dosing and duration of treatment, and strongly confirms that Ivermectin is VERY effective as both a prophylactic and a cure for COVID. Emphasis added below:
It’s difficult to believe that the designers of these studies were unaware of the dosing of ivermectin. Despite all of the above analyses, the reasoning behind the ivermectin underdosing or unfavorable study design may be linked to factors beyond science.
A new drug or vaccine cannot achieve an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) status if there is an existing viable therapeutic available. This fact alone may have impacted many decisions.
The NIH website lists only those RCTs [Randomized Controlled Trials] that I found to have design flaws (or potential fraud) to justify its recommendation against the use of ivermectin in the treatment of COVID-19.
Peer-reviewed studies showing the efficacy of ivermectin in treating COVID-19 have been retracted without explanation, and doctors have been demonized, censored, and doxxed for speaking the truth.
Legacy media, including The New York Times and CNN, reported incomplete and improperly interpreted trials that failed to present an accurate representation of ivermectin’s effects*.
"The Science" is corrupted beyond belief.
The article contains information on effective dosing and duration of treatment, and strongly confirms that Ivermectin is VERY effective as both a prophylactic and a cure for COVID. Emphasis added below: