If you’re referring to the redundancies, I’m talking about the ship that hit the FSK bridge. There are multiple fail safes to keep something like this from happening and yet it steered directly into the concrete pylon. Supposedly there wasn’t even a crew on that ship and it was steered remotely into the bridge. It’s almost assuredly an attack on our infrastructure from the deep state. You’ll see more things like this as more of their world is being exposed to the public and they need to divert and distract from themselves as much as possible. They don’t care about the American public and they’ll burn down Rome to take us all down if they can.
No, I was asking what redundancies the barges in the story here had.
If you think that the barges in this story were deliberately released to cause harm, what redundancies did they have to prevent damage?
You will see in the days ahead that the cabal will start to go crazy with more events like the FSK bridge which was definitely a planned event. There are multiple redundancies on those ships to prevent such things from happening.
You weren't just talking about the barge involved in the FSK incident. You seem to be using the FSK incident to claim that all the other incidents you've read about since have redundancies as well. If that wasn't your intention, there's no reason to bring up the FSK incident to point to this incident being deliberate. Because it has nothing to do with it. You're trying to use guilt by association here.
So how does that apply to this story? How did the cabal orchestrate heavy rains in the area and the flooding that caused the fast currents in the river that broke these barges loose?
I stand by what I said. If you look at events similar to this one prior to the FSK incident, you'll find that they've been happening all along.
It's only because the FSK event was a huge catastrophe, which caught the attention of the public, because people like to rubberneck at accidents. Now anything that happens concerning boats or bridges or waterways gets shared more because of that. I guarantee in two months, no one here will be talking about barges anymore, unless something new comes up about the FSK incident. It sure doesn't mean there aren't anymore incidents concerning boats/barges/bridges/waterways. But people will have tired of it and moved on to something else to talk about.
It will certainly put to test your theory that all these incidents are in the news because the cabal is making it happen. So just check back in with me in a couple months to see who is right. Or I can put it on my calendar to remind you.
I was referring to redundancies only in the actual ship that hit the bridge. And yes the cabal can cause heavy rains and flooding for the barges. And who’s to say they weren’t intentionally cut loose. They’ve been using weather manipulation for decades. The most obvious was Katrina. If you follow the path it took, it was literally steered into the gulf. After the devastation there, they all out practiced their gun confiscation.
Anyway, on to the point of bridge stories. I don’t buy your cycle news theory of people only talking about them more because of FSK and other stories like that. I’m sayin if they had been happening all along then the millions of cell phones with cameras out there would have been recording events and putting them on social media. There is a definite uptick in these events as of late and you won’t convince me otherwise.
Also, one of the other recent ones was almost exactly like the FSK one, with the cargo ship hitting the pylon, but it didn’t bring the bridge down. It wasn’t widely covered because no catastrophe happened but the video evidence was clear by the people filming from the shore.
Fine. Like I said, we'll revisit the topic in a couple of months and see how long it was the last topic here was about the subject, then we'll look for similar incidents to these that are happening but aren't being shared here.
Don't you agree that would support my argument that what we're seeing has more to do with news consumption rather than the incident rates?
Or what if we looked for similar incidents that happened prior to the FSK incident, but didn't get shared here. How would that affect your stance on the subject?
Would either of those outcomes change your opinion?
Just curious, do you believe all weather related disasters are caused by the cabal?
You're just repeating what you said in the last post and ignoring the points I made and questions I asked.
If you’re referring to the redundancies, I’m talking about the ship that hit the FSK bridge. There are multiple fail safes to keep something like this from happening and yet it steered directly into the concrete pylon. Supposedly there wasn’t even a crew on that ship and it was steered remotely into the bridge. It’s almost assuredly an attack on our infrastructure from the deep state. You’ll see more things like this as more of their world is being exposed to the public and they need to divert and distract from themselves as much as possible. They don’t care about the American public and they’ll burn down Rome to take us all down if they can.
No, I was asking what redundancies the barges in the story here had.
If you think that the barges in this story were deliberately released to cause harm, what redundancies did they have to prevent damage?
You weren't just talking about the barge involved in the FSK incident. You seem to be using the FSK incident to claim that all the other incidents you've read about since have redundancies as well. If that wasn't your intention, there's no reason to bring up the FSK incident to point to this incident being deliberate. Because it has nothing to do with it. You're trying to use guilt by association here.
So how does that apply to this story? How did the cabal orchestrate heavy rains in the area and the flooding that caused the fast currents in the river that broke these barges loose?
I stand by what I said. If you look at events similar to this one prior to the FSK incident, you'll find that they've been happening all along.
It's only because the FSK event was a huge catastrophe, which caught the attention of the public, because people like to rubberneck at accidents. Now anything that happens concerning boats or bridges or waterways gets shared more because of that. I guarantee in two months, no one here will be talking about barges anymore, unless something new comes up about the FSK incident. It sure doesn't mean there aren't anymore incidents concerning boats/barges/bridges/waterways. But people will have tired of it and moved on to something else to talk about.
It will certainly put to test your theory that all these incidents are in the news because the cabal is making it happen. So just check back in with me in a couple months to see who is right. Or I can put it on my calendar to remind you.
I was referring to redundancies only in the actual ship that hit the bridge. And yes the cabal can cause heavy rains and flooding for the barges. And who’s to say they weren’t intentionally cut loose. They’ve been using weather manipulation for decades. The most obvious was Katrina. If you follow the path it took, it was literally steered into the gulf. After the devastation there, they all out practiced their gun confiscation. Anyway, on to the point of bridge stories. I don’t buy your cycle news theory of people only talking about them more because of FSK and other stories like that. I’m sayin if they had been happening all along then the millions of cell phones with cameras out there would have been recording events and putting them on social media. There is a definite uptick in these events as of late and you won’t convince me otherwise. Also, one of the other recent ones was almost exactly like the FSK one, with the cargo ship hitting the pylon, but it didn’t bring the bridge down. It wasn’t widely covered because no catastrophe happened but the video evidence was clear by the people filming from the shore.
Fine. Like I said, we'll revisit the topic in a couple of months and see how long it was the last topic here was about the subject, then we'll look for similar incidents to these that are happening but aren't being shared here.
Don't you agree that would support my argument that what we're seeing has more to do with news consumption rather than the incident rates?
Or what if we looked for similar incidents that happened prior to the FSK incident, but didn't get shared here. How would that affect your stance on the subject?
Would either of those outcomes change your opinion?
Just curious, do you believe all weather related disasters are caused by the cabal?