What do you mean you don't decide? Earlier you said Katrina was obviously orchestrated by the Cabal because of it looking like it was steered into the Gulf.
If you're not deciding for yourself if the cabal is responsible for weather disasters, then who is deciding for you?
I know extreme weather manipulation for nefarious reasons is a popular belief among many Anons, but I'm not fully on board with it. I've seen too many people use weather disasters to rationalize their beliefs. For example, whenever a weather disaster hits some blue state like NY or CA, then it's called an act of God to punish the liberals living there. But whenever weather disasters hit red states, then it was orchestrated by the Cabal. After seeing scenarios like that time after time, it's jaded me a bit on the whole "the cabal controls all the bad weather events when it happens in red states, but the weather disasters in blue states are God's wrath".
That's why I was interested in how you determined if a weather disaster was natural or if it was caused by the Cabal. I'm sincerely interested in learning more about what people should look for in "natural disasters" to determine if they are natural or not.
Again, there are literal memos, emails, internal documents and patents on this stuff. Doesn’t matter if you’re on board with it or not, it’s inarguable fact at this point, just like chemtrails. Katrina was just an in your face example of blatant manipulation, especially with how they used the aftermath to practice totalitarian exercises.
So how do you decide which is a legitimate, natural weather occurrence and which is caused by the Cabal?
If it makes the news or not?
I don’t decide. I just know overall, a lot of weather events are getting more violent and intense.
What do you mean you don't decide? Earlier you said Katrina was obviously orchestrated by the Cabal because of it looking like it was steered into the Gulf.
If you're not deciding for yourself if the cabal is responsible for weather disasters, then who is deciding for you?
I know extreme weather manipulation for nefarious reasons is a popular belief among many Anons, but I'm not fully on board with it. I've seen too many people use weather disasters to rationalize their beliefs. For example, whenever a weather disaster hits some blue state like NY or CA, then it's called an act of God to punish the liberals living there. But whenever weather disasters hit red states, then it was orchestrated by the Cabal. After seeing scenarios like that time after time, it's jaded me a bit on the whole "the cabal controls all the bad weather events when it happens in red states, but the weather disasters in blue states are God's wrath".
That's why I was interested in how you determined if a weather disaster was natural or if it was caused by the Cabal. I'm sincerely interested in learning more about what people should look for in "natural disasters" to determine if they are natural or not.
Again, there are literal memos, emails, internal documents and patents on this stuff. Doesn’t matter if you’re on board with it or not, it’s inarguable fact at this point, just like chemtrails. Katrina was just an in your face example of blatant manipulation, especially with how they used the aftermath to practice totalitarian exercises.
Ok. I'm not going to bother asking again, because it's obvious you're never going to actually answer the question I asked.