For whatever reason this is one of the conspiracies I haven't done much independent research on. Thoughts appreciated. Mainly, how are the commercial airlines complicit if this is a real thing? How does something like this not have a whistleblower? I am seeing people like Attkinson and Naomi Wolf post about this on Twitter so I am leaning towards maybe its a thing.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (63)
sorted by:
No mr rocket scientist, your just speculating about me and what I know based your own ignorance and naive understanding of this topic.
If you merely searched the key words such as “stratospheric aerosol injections”, the evidence presents itself, such as who the generic reference of who “they” implies.
Here are examples of real factual situations where the government sprayed its own people without they’re knowledge or consent and did harm in the process. It also provides evidence of planes ring outfitted to spray chemicals and biological weapons.
Take note of how the military used private corporations that work along side them.
https://www.wondersandmarvels.com/2014/06/experimenting-innocent-u-s-armys-secret-chemical-testing-1950s-1960s.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK233494/
“During the 1950s and 1960s, Stanford University and the Ralph Parsons Company (both contractors for the U.S. Army Chemical Corps) conducted atmospheric-dispersion tests with ZnCdS particles in Minneapolis, MN; Corpus Christi, TX; St. Louis, MO; Fort Wayne, IN; and 29 other urban and rural locations in the United States and Canada. The tests were purportedly used to develop and verify meteorologic models for estimating the dispersion of aerosols in various environments. However, the real purpose was to obtain information that would be useful for estimating the potential dispersion of BW agents and determining munitions requirements for the strategic use of BW agents against selected cities of the former Soviet Union. The tests were designed to provide information on the dispersion of BW agents over a short distance (for example, within a city, such as Minneapolis), over many miles (Fort Wayne, IN), and over several thousand square miles (Large Area Coverage test).
Operation LAC, which took its name from "Large Area Coverage," was the largest test ever undertaken by the Chemical Corps. The test area covered the United States from the Rockies to the Atlantic, and from Canada to the Gulf of Mexico. The tests proved the feasibility of covering large areas (thousands of square miles) of a country with BW agents. Many scientists and officers had believed this possible, but LAC provided the first proof.
I have no doubt this happened, or similar events, but past actions do not prove the occurrence of present actions. Earlier parts of the overall program involved ground-based emission sites. Project LAC involved C-119 airborne carriers, which had a maximum altitude capability of only 29,000 feet, and would certainly not be operating at maximum altitude if the objective was mass ground distribution. (The had another career as forest fire water bombers, where the altitudes were substantially lower.) The experiments did cover distances as far as 1200 miles from the drop point, but were the result of air masses moving into/across the drop zone carrying the particles away. (The particles were chosen because they were fluorescent and could be optically tracked.) "Thousands of square miles" of coverage is a lot, but the continental United States has a total area of 3.1 million square miles. It would be an uphill struggle to cover the entire population in the teeth of prevailing weather.
The military always use private companies to provide goods and services. These operations were not kept secret; they were simply unadvertised, and later came under criticism. I have no doubt they were prohibited. So, am I clear that such prohibitions are to be dismissed as nonexistent---or are they as potent as the new (toothless) Tennessee law?
Interesting that you had to pull a 67-year-old rabbit out of a hat for your "aha" moment. All it proves is the possibility to pull off a limited operation with special aircraft operating lower than typical for commercial flights. No indication that any of these sprays were even visible, and I would expect them not to be if they were below contrail altitude. Still no evidence for "chemtrails."
So now we have on the record,a history of the abuser and the absolute fact that the government has sprayed aerosolized chemicals from planes to conduct biological and chemical warfare operations and their tests were successful and have accomplished the logistics of spraying entire populations and large areas, therefore making the claim that they are still doing it, 100 percent plausible and credible.
We have also established the absolute fact that the government conducts experiments on its own population using chemical and biological agents without their knowledge or consent. Through the Tuskegee experiments we establish that they do not care about the well-being or health of the ignorant population.
We have established as fact that through covid and the mRNA kill shot, the US inc. “government” are in fact still in the business of conducting chemical and biological warfare operations and experiments on its own population without their knowledge and consent.
You know you can convict a murderer with circumstantial evidence.
Why are you so stubborn as to want to continue to defend your abusive wife beating husband?
We can continue to walk through the evidence and establish fact if you’d like?
Right off the bat, you misidentify the past actions. They conducted dispersal experiments, not biological or chemical warfare operations. Their tests were indicative, but weather conditions greatly affected the dispersal patterns (as one might expect). Making the claim that "chemtrails" are being performed in a massive program is not credible, for reasons of expense, futility, logistics, and lack of physical evidence.
Back to the opening: the dispersal experiments did not involve chemical or biological agents (out of concern for the population). If you want to bring in the subject of covid 19, that did not involve any infection mechanism of this sort.
And, although covid 19 was dastardly, the commission of one crime is not evidence of the commission of a different crime. All you are doing is impeaching the character of the current power strucure, but suspicion is not proof.
I am stubborn because there is no EVIDENCE that "chemtrails" exist in fact or are the product of a vast program. The concern is ALL based on primitive ignorance of what contrails are and how they are formed. You are basing your logic on the fallacy of "because it could be so, it must be so."
How is it that the topic of spraying chemicals out of planes for weather modification and research for weaponizing that capability has gone on for almost 100 years and yet here you are submersed in the industry and clueless about any of it?
Should we take or even care about the opinion of someone so naive?
https://archive.org/stream/weatificat00unit/weatificat00unit_djvu.txt
There’s a pretty long history of outfitting planes to spray experimental chemical Mixtures out of planes to try and manipulate the weather.
What is it that you would call spraying chemical mixtures out of a plane that leaves a trail behind it.
How have you been involved in aircraft but so be so naive about weather modification and the entire industry around it?
So at the beginning of our conversation you said there was no way they were outfitting planes to do this because of your knowledge in the industry.
Now your saying well they did and have but it wasn’t chemicals or anything harmful.
How do you know? The proven liars with a history of lying told you so?
You admit to them committing genocide through the biological weapon that originally came from the same fort that performed those biological and chemical air tests from back in the day. Coincidence?
Your excuse saying pictures only show firefighters dropping extinguisher is pretty pathetic.
I think the biggest thing we can take away from this conversation so far is the fact that chemtrails have absolutely been sprayed out of planes and by your own admittance you have no idea what that looks like.
Using that logic, we can then gather that when death ray looks up at planes he couldn’t tell what he’s looking at anyway.
Invent what you want, but actual seeding is essentially invisible, and has not been practiced at high altitude---for the obvious reason of excessive dispersal. You have the problem that there are no reports of anyone seeing this.
However, there are plenty of reports and photos of airplanes dumping loads of extinguishing agent to combat forest fires. But you don't seem to be concerned about that at all.
"Chemtrail" advocates, however, have the problem that what they see are contrails and cannot understand that fact. It is as though they see horses and think they are unicorns. I know a lot about contrails, from what they are to what they appear. You couldn't identify a "chemtrail" if your life depended on it.
No evidence of chemtrails because I haven’t presented that evidence yet.
So far
We’ve established the culprit and we’ve identified who “they” are, being the United States Incorporated and its private corporate co conspirator subsidiaries, mainly revolving around the dod.
We’ve established a long history of abuses concerning the operations involving uninformed populations with no consent or knowledge.
We’ve established the lack of concern and care towards the health and well being of the populations involved.
We’ve established that it is 100 percent possible to outfit planes with aerosolized chemical and biological weapons and can effectively target populations with the desired outcomes necessary to be effective.
And we have established that the current and modern era government is currently conducting biological experiments and warfare upon its people.
Now we come to what the current debate over solar geo engineering is, what stratospheric aerosolized injection is and what this means exactly and how it relates to everything above.
Which comes nowhere close to establishing that anything is actually happening. All you have is a bad past record and paranoia.
Do you take the attitude that it is possible to rely on the state of Tennessee's legal prohibition against "chemtrails", but it is not possible to rely on the federal government's discontinuation of the limited experimental program upon public criticism? Why not wait and see if anyone is charged and convicted under the Tennessee law?
I do not think laws prevent criminals from being criminals no. Take a look at the pedophiles within the federal intelligence agencies protecting Epstein and all his clients.