Good article. Rush Limbaugh used to talk about "the Oprah-fication of our society," meaning that large numbers of women in positions of authority has led to a society based more on feelings than rigid, objective common sense. Sparta and Rome did not have these problems, and they lasted far longer than our Republic has to this point.
Few people want to utter these glaring and unpopular ideas, so I'll do it for them. Until strong men throw off the charges of "toxic masculinity" and embrace those traits again, and reassert themselves in the public square, America will never again achieve greatness.
You are quite right, there ARE women (my wife included) who are sensible and make good leaders. I was speaking broadly, however. But it's no accident that "The View" is comprised solely of women. Such a cluster of ignorance and stupidity, not to mention those who idolize the program, is just a sign of our times.
There are exceptions to every rule, but in the main, I would rather be governed by a masculine dominated government, one that knows and honors its limitations and is ready -- nay, EAGER -- to defend our borders and call a tranny mentally ill and an illegal alien a criminal, than a soft, feminine government that will "tolerate" such misfits until normalcy is marginalized.
I'd much prefer to live in a Spartan or Roman society, than in this Oprah-fied overly sensitive mess we have today.
So, the black belt I earned and the debates in undertake against exactly what you’re complaining are unnecessary because I am a woman?
I have yet to see any of the men on my campus stand up for what is right. I have, however, done what I can to push back.
As in all things, there must be balance. I’d recommend reading Troilus and Cressida, despite its flaws, for a reminder of how hypermasculinity can cause failure just as easily as the “feminine hysteria” you seem to be referring to here.
Good article. Rush Limbaugh used to talk about "the Oprah-fication of our society," meaning that large numbers of women in positions of authority has led to a society based more on feelings than rigid, objective common sense. Sparta and Rome did not have these problems, and they lasted far longer than our Republic has to this point.
Few people want to utter these glaring and unpopular ideas, so I'll do it for them. Until strong men throw off the charges of "toxic masculinity" and embrace those traits again, and reassert themselves in the public square, America will never again achieve greatness.
Some women, like myself, practice stoicism.
We aren’t all bimbos. Black and white thinking like this works both ways.
You are quite right, there ARE women (my wife included) who are sensible and make good leaders. I was speaking broadly, however. But it's no accident that "The View" is comprised solely of women. Such a cluster of ignorance and stupidity, not to mention those who idolize the program, is just a sign of our times.
There are exceptions to every rule, but in the main, I would rather be governed by a masculine dominated government, one that knows and honors its limitations and is ready -- nay, EAGER -- to defend our borders and call a tranny mentally ill and an illegal alien a criminal, than a soft, feminine government that will "tolerate" such misfits until normalcy is marginalized.
I'd much prefer to live in a Spartan or Roman society, than in this Oprah-fied overly sensitive mess we have today.
So, the black belt I earned and the debates in undertake against exactly what you’re complaining are unnecessary because I am a woman?
I have yet to see any of the men on my campus stand up for what is right. I have, however, done what I can to push back.
As in all things, there must be balance. I’d recommend reading Troilus and Cressida, despite its flaws, for a reminder of how hypermasculinity can cause failure just as easily as the “feminine hysteria” you seem to be referring to here.
Predictably you have chosen to misunderstand my thesis. I love strong women, it's just that we have way too many weak women (and men) running things.