This aged well... Will this post last longer than it did on patriots.win..
(media.greatawakening.win)
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (58)
sorted by:
That is not what a strawman argument is.
A strawman argument is building up an argument and then attacking it whilst avoiding your argument. I directly addressed your argument.
You said that it is unconstitutional and therefore can't and doesn't happen and wouldn't pass Congress -- and you assert this in spite of unconstitutional laws doing exactly that, even if they end up struck down (and subsequently ignored by Biden admin).
The entire pretext is as stated in your post -- that it can't happen because it's unconstitutional -- and I attacked that and asserted that if your bar is that low that your argument has no foundation because they are already using it as toilet paper and performing unconstitutional acts.
Then you had the actual audacity to claim "Constitutional interpretation"? Get the fuck out of here with that. Those are the arguments they use to ban AR-15s and subvert the Constitution in even more overt ways, and it is bullshit.
The Constitution is not supposed to be "interpreted", it is to be obeyed as written.
You literally did that you idiot lol. And now you are changing what you said...
You never said "if your bar is that low."
You are being dishonest at this point and I can't engage.
You will keep moving the goal post, the facts are on my side.
"If unconstitutional is your bar".
You can't engage because you can't win, because you were wrong. Congrats, fren. Let's go our separate ways now.
Take care.
Everything I said is factually correct. If it isn't provide me with a retort?
All you did was say it was BS.
But is a fact that we use constitutional interpretation.
Idk why you are this fucking stupid?