It's a start, for sure. I think 10 years will largely work as a deterrent. Consider, many of these doctors wouldn't last if they were put into a prison. They are not generally fighters, especially these types.
The real key that leads to dissatisfaction is the wording.
"Can", "up to". Implying that it will not be the case for all of them. It gives people an out when charging and sentencing them.
Though of course, I am reading Charlie Kirk's post here about it and not the actual law as it stands.
10 years? For ruining a child's life? It's a good start, but it needs to be a longer sentence.
It's a start, for sure. I think 10 years will largely work as a deterrent. Consider, many of these doctors wouldn't last if they were put into a prison. They are not generally fighters, especially these types.
The real key that leads to dissatisfaction is the wording.
"Can", "up to". Implying that it will not be the case for all of them. It gives people an out when charging and sentencing them.
Though of course, I am reading Charlie Kirk's post here about it and not the actual law as it stands.