So you're saying that God, under the old covenant which demanded animal sacrifices (which was pointing to the ultimate sacrifice of Jesus) requiring a sacrifice for the atonement of sins was evil?
By what standard? You're obviously rejecting God and by doing so you don't have any objective standards of good or evil. Everything becomes subjective and ultimately nothing matters. You lose the ability to call anything good or evil in a purposeless universe where you're just a cosmic accident.
After Jesus, who was the perfect sacrifice, animal sacrifices no longer how we are made righteous before God and cleansed our sins. Any rejection of Christ via animal sacrifice would now be considered a sinful rebellion but prior to Christ's sacrifice would have been considered objectively good and an active obedience to your creator which is the only place they consistent objective definition of good can come from.
That’s Buddhist theory practitioner, not a Buddhist religion, like water down … my friend consider herself Buddhist too but eat vegetables only once a week or month type.
I practice true Buddhism & chant Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo & recite verses from two chapters of the Lotus Sutra everyday, study the writing of Nichiren Daishonin, & former President Ikeda, share information of my practice with others and attend various activities through my lay organization. https://www.sgi-usa.org/
(1) Gautama Buddha ate pork. The practice is to not cause it to be killed for you. I knew a cook who was a full-time Tibetan monk for over 10 years who cooked meat at the restaurant where he worked. Buddhism is not a kind of perfectionism.
(2) Buddhist practitioners at least in the Japanese tradition do not refer to Buddhism as a "religion", but as a "practice".
Any religion that practices ritual sacrifice is evil. I thought HRC was already tried & executed for treason & crimes against children.
So you're saying that God, under the old covenant which demanded animal sacrifices (which was pointing to the ultimate sacrifice of Jesus) requiring a sacrifice for the atonement of sins was evil?
By what standard? You're obviously rejecting God and by doing so you don't have any objective standards of good or evil. Everything becomes subjective and ultimately nothing matters. You lose the ability to call anything good or evil in a purposeless universe where you're just a cosmic accident.
After Jesus, who was the perfect sacrifice, animal sacrifices no longer how we are made righteous before God and cleansed our sins. Any rejection of Christ via animal sacrifice would now be considered a sinful rebellion but prior to Christ's sacrifice would have been considered objectively good and an active obedience to your creator which is the only place they consistent objective definition of good can come from.
Christians don’t practice religious ritual sacrifice in society today. It is my opinion that only evil people do in the 21st century.
Not everyone here who is a Patriot, is a Christian. I am a Buddhist. Not a vegetarian either.
That’s Buddhist theory practitioner, not a Buddhist religion, like water down … my friend consider herself Buddhist too but eat vegetables only once a week or month type.
I practice true Buddhism & chant Nam-Myoho-Renge-Kyo & recite verses from two chapters of the Lotus Sutra everyday, study the writing of Nichiren Daishonin, & former President Ikeda, share information of my practice with others and attend various activities through my lay organization. https://www.sgi-usa.org/
(1) Gautama Buddha ate pork. The practice is to not cause it to be killed for you. I knew a cook who was a full-time Tibetan monk for over 10 years who cooked meat at the restaurant where he worked. Buddhism is not a kind of perfectionism.
(2) Buddhist practitioners at least in the Japanese tradition do not refer to Buddhism as a "religion", but as a "practice".