Christians have a holy book. That is the worship of a book.
Are you ignorant or just dishonest? Christians have the Word of God which they follow to learn about and worship the God that inspired it.
Once again Rape and chattel slavery are both punishable by death in scripture.
Rape:
Old Testament Perspective: In the Old Testament, rape is considered a serious offense. Deuteronomy 22:25-27 states that if a man rapes a woman who is betrothed (engaged), both the rapist and the victim are protected. If the rape occurs in the countryside where the victim could have called for help but didn't, only the rapist is punished by death. However, if the rape occurs in a city where the victim's cries for help might not be heard, both the rapist and the victim are considered innocent.
New Testament Perspective: While the New Testament doesn't provide specific punishments for rape, it emphasizes love, respect, and care for one another. In Matthew 22:39, Jesus commands us to love our neighbor as ourselves, which includes respecting their bodily integrity and autonomy. Rape violates this principle and is contrary to the spirit of love and respect taught in the New Testament.
Chattel Slavery:
Old Testament Perspective: The Old Testament regulated slavery, but it wasn't akin to the chattel slavery seen in more recent history. Exodus 21:16 explicitly prohibits kidnapping someone to enslave them, and this was punishable by death. This verse underscores the value of human life and the severity of forcibly enslaving another person.
New Testament Perspective: Although the New Testament doesn't directly address chattel slavery, it promotes principles that challenge the institution. Galatians 3:28 emphasizes the equality of all believers in Christ, regardless of social status or ethnicity. Additionally, Paul's letter to Philemon encourages him to receive his runaway slave, Onesimus, as a brother in Christ rather than as a slave.
Numbers 31:14-18 describes the aftermath of the Israelites' victory over the Midianites. It is often misconstrued as condoning rape and chattel slavery, but a careful examination within the context of the passage and the broader biblical principles reveals a different interpretation:
Context of the Passage: In Numbers 31, the Israelites were commanded to take vengeance on the Midianites because they had seduced the Israelites into idolatry and immorality. The passage describes the plunder that the Israelites took from the Midianites, including women and children.
War Booty, Not Rape: The passage mentions the women and children captured in the war, but it does not condone rape. Instead, it describes how Moses instructed the Israelites to purify themselves and the captives before allowing them to join the Israelite community. This purification process likely involved ceremonial cleansing to ensure the sanctity of the community, rather than condoning sexual violence.
Cultural and Historical Context: In ancient Near Eastern warfare, it was common for victorious armies to take captives, including women and children, as spoils of war. The passage reflects the realities of ancient warfare rather than endorsing rape or chattel slavery.
Moral Principles in Scripture: The Bible consistently upholds principles of justice, compassion, and respect for human dignity. While the Old Testament does regulate practices such as slavery, it also contains laws and principles that protect the vulnerable and promote justice. For example, Exodus 21:16 explicitly condemns kidnapping and enslavement, and other passages emphasize the importance of treating others with fairness and kindness.
Bond servitude in scripture refers to a form of servitude or indentured labor where an individual voluntarily enters into a contractual agreement to serve another for a specific period of time in exchange for various benefits, such as shelter, food, and protection. This form of servitude is distinct from modern chattel slavery, as it typically involves:
Voluntary Agreement: In biblical times, individuals often entered into servitude willingly due to economic circumstances, such as debt or poverty. Unlike chattel slavery, which involves the forcible enslavement of individuals without their consent, bond servitude in scripture was a contractual arrangement agreed upon by both parties.
Limited Duration: Bond servitude was typically temporary, with a predetermined period of service. According to the laws outlined in the Old Testament, a Hebrew indentured servant could serve for a maximum of six years, after which they were to be released with provisions for their well-being (Exodus 21:2-6).
Protections and Rights: The Mosaic Law provided specific protections and rights for indentured servants. For example, they were to be treated with fairness and kindness (Deuteronomy 15:12-15), and they were included in the Sabbath rest (Exodus 20:10). Additionally, if a servant chose to remain with their master after their term of service ended, they could do so, but their ear would be pierced as a sign of their voluntary decision (Exodus 21:5-6).
Opportunities for Social Mobility: In some cases, bond servitude provided opportunities for social and economic advancement. For example, a servant could learn valuable skills during their term of service, which could benefit them upon their release.
Release and Freedom: At the end of their term of service, bond servants were to be released with provisions for their welfare, ensuring they had the means to start anew and were not left destitute.
In contrast, modern slavery, especially historical chattel slavery, involved the ownership of individuals as property, often through force or coercion. Modern slavery typically lacks the voluntary aspect, limited duration, and legal protections afforded to bond servants in biblical times. Additionally, modern slavery often involves systemic exploitation, violence, and the denial of basic human rights.
Therefore, while bond servitude in scripture shares some similarities with modern forms of labor arrangements, such as employment contracts or apprenticeships, it fundamentally differs from modern slavery in its voluntary nature, limited duration, legal protections, and opportunities for social mobility and freedom.
Are you ignorant or just dishonest? Christians have the Word of God which they follow to learn about and worship the God that inspired it.
Once again Rape and chattel slavery are both punishable by death in scripture.
Rape: Old Testament Perspective: In the Old Testament, rape is considered a serious offense. Deuteronomy 22:25-27 states that if a man rapes a woman who is betrothed (engaged), both the rapist and the victim are protected. If the rape occurs in the countryside where the victim could have called for help but didn't, only the rapist is punished by death. However, if the rape occurs in a city where the victim's cries for help might not be heard, both the rapist and the victim are considered innocent. New Testament Perspective: While the New Testament doesn't provide specific punishments for rape, it emphasizes love, respect, and care for one another. In Matthew 22:39, Jesus commands us to love our neighbor as ourselves, which includes respecting their bodily integrity and autonomy. Rape violates this principle and is contrary to the spirit of love and respect taught in the New Testament. Chattel Slavery: Old Testament Perspective: The Old Testament regulated slavery, but it wasn't akin to the chattel slavery seen in more recent history. Exodus 21:16 explicitly prohibits kidnapping someone to enslave them, and this was punishable by death. This verse underscores the value of human life and the severity of forcibly enslaving another person. New Testament Perspective: Although the New Testament doesn't directly address chattel slavery, it promotes principles that challenge the institution. Galatians 3:28 emphasizes the equality of all believers in Christ, regardless of social status or ethnicity. Additionally, Paul's letter to Philemon encourages him to receive his runaway slave, Onesimus, as a brother in Christ rather than as a slave.
Numbers 31:14-18 describes the aftermath of the Israelites' victory over the Midianites. It is often misconstrued as condoning rape and chattel slavery, but a careful examination within the context of the passage and the broader biblical principles reveals a different interpretation:
Context of the Passage: In Numbers 31, the Israelites were commanded to take vengeance on the Midianites because they had seduced the Israelites into idolatry and immorality. The passage describes the plunder that the Israelites took from the Midianites, including women and children. War Booty, Not Rape: The passage mentions the women and children captured in the war, but it does not condone rape. Instead, it describes how Moses instructed the Israelites to purify themselves and the captives before allowing them to join the Israelite community. This purification process likely involved ceremonial cleansing to ensure the sanctity of the community, rather than condoning sexual violence. Cultural and Historical Context: In ancient Near Eastern warfare, it was common for victorious armies to take captives, including women and children, as spoils of war. The passage reflects the realities of ancient warfare rather than endorsing rape or chattel slavery. Moral Principles in Scripture: The Bible consistently upholds principles of justice, compassion, and respect for human dignity. While the Old Testament does regulate practices such as slavery, it also contains laws and principles that protect the vulnerable and promote justice. For example, Exodus 21:16 explicitly condemns kidnapping and enslavement, and other passages emphasize the importance of treating others with fairness and kindness.
Bond servitude in scripture refers to a form of servitude or indentured labor where an individual voluntarily enters into a contractual agreement to serve another for a specific period of time in exchange for various benefits, such as shelter, food, and protection. This form of servitude is distinct from modern chattel slavery, as it typically involves:
Voluntary Agreement: In biblical times, individuals often entered into servitude willingly due to economic circumstances, such as debt or poverty. Unlike chattel slavery, which involves the forcible enslavement of individuals without their consent, bond servitude in scripture was a contractual arrangement agreed upon by both parties. Limited Duration: Bond servitude was typically temporary, with a predetermined period of service. According to the laws outlined in the Old Testament, a Hebrew indentured servant could serve for a maximum of six years, after which they were to be released with provisions for their well-being (Exodus 21:2-6). Protections and Rights: The Mosaic Law provided specific protections and rights for indentured servants. For example, they were to be treated with fairness and kindness (Deuteronomy 15:12-15), and they were included in the Sabbath rest (Exodus 20:10). Additionally, if a servant chose to remain with their master after their term of service ended, they could do so, but their ear would be pierced as a sign of their voluntary decision (Exodus 21:5-6). Opportunities for Social Mobility: In some cases, bond servitude provided opportunities for social and economic advancement. For example, a servant could learn valuable skills during their term of service, which could benefit them upon their release. Release and Freedom: At the end of their term of service, bond servants were to be released with provisions for their welfare, ensuring they had the means to start anew and were not left destitute. In contrast, modern slavery, especially historical chattel slavery, involved the ownership of individuals as property, often through force or coercion. Modern slavery typically lacks the voluntary aspect, limited duration, and legal protections afforded to bond servants in biblical times. Additionally, modern slavery often involves systemic exploitation, violence, and the denial of basic human rights.
Therefore, while bond servitude in scripture shares some similarities with modern forms of labor arrangements, such as employment contracts or apprenticeships, it fundamentally differs from modern slavery in its voluntary nature, limited duration, legal protections, and opportunities for social mobility and freedom.
Don't step to me son . I know more than you.