They use a term: mock them to the point of ashes. They know not what words they use, what they are actually saying:
for instance:
election-denier. Nope. Your claim is: election is fraudulent.
Climate-denier. Nope. Your claim is that climate change happens. The SOURCE is different from their claim.
The objective here with language is to incorporate a moral position, while in effect, they know not what they say. These people are indeed: stupid.
10 rules of radicals:
They use a term: mock them to the point of ashes. They know not what words they use, what they are actually saying:
for instance:
election-denier. Nope. Your claim is: election is fraudulent. Climate-denier. Nope. Your claim is that climate change happens. The SOURCE is different from their claim.
The objective here with language is to incorporate a moral position, while in effect, they know not what they say. These people are indeed: stupid.
Use your wits. Mock/ meme them to oblivion.