SCOTUS.🚨

The Supreme Court is Likely to Uphold Presidential Immunity for Donald Trump: Analysis

“After listening to arguments at the Supreme Court, it’s clear the justices will narrowly hold the President of the United States—any president—is immune from criminal prosecution for official (not personal) acts," the Article 3 Project's Legal Analyst @mrddmia said in an official statement.

"Additionally or alternatively, the Court will reaffirm criminal statutes do not apply to the President, unless they are explicit. The Court will remand Jack Smith’s January 6th case to DC Obama Judge Tanya Chutkan for an evidentiary hearing. Her decision is immediately appealable to the DC Circuit, and the Supreme Court could take the case again before trial."

"The Court’s likely holding will also substantially affect Fani Willis’ January 6th case—and may affect Jack Smith’s presidential-records case. And the Supreme Court’s Fischer decision on obstruction will likely destroy two of Jack Smith’s four January 6th charges against Trump. Only 20% of Jack Smith’s January 6th case will remain. The case will not get tried before the election."

“Bottom line: This will become a historic win for President Trump—and the presidency and our country. This is a big step toward undoing the Democrats’ republic-ending lawfare and election interference against President Trump."

👉🏻 https://twitter.com/kylenabecker/status/1783538524257391085?t=ZFePna-V_PrF3kMUEMcoyQ&s=19

36 comments

36 comments share save hide report block hide replies

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q

Comments (36)

sorted by:

▲ 2 ▼

– Etmb55 2 points 244 days ago +2 / -0

Good analysis based on the questioning; however there is another possibility. All nine appear to favor some type of presidential immunity and a majority seem to favor immunity for whatever President Trump is accused of. They could unanimously hold that he is not subject to prosecution for the specific offenses charged without addressing the reason for the decision or setting rules for some unknown occurrence in the future. No one can predict what situation might be encountered by a sitting president and what action might be necessary to deal with it. We don't need a rule for everything that might happen.

permalink parent save report block reply