How is bringing up different aspects of the food chain falsely equivalent? Crocodiles gotta eat, who am I to free that child from it's teeth? Crocodile might starve or maybe find another child to eat. By your logic I should just keep recording and let the crocodile have it's dinner. "There are no winners or losers just life". Fuck that kid, reptiles gotta eat too. I'm exaggerating to debate that morality should play a part if we intervene with nature. If you wouldn't save a baby squirrel from a snake in your front yard where would you draw the line and change the course of nature?

Spare the life of the fly on your kitchen sink laying eggs in your food? Spare the wolf eating your neighbor's lamb? Let the mice shit on your canned food in the basement? Let weeds take over your vegetable garden? It's just nature and there's no winners and losers right?