Also, nobody asked them to be the arbitors ot truth. They simply assumed the role, and expect everyone else to believe whatever they say.
You can tell fact checkers are worthless because they never challenge any official narrative… they only challenge those who challenge the official narrative.
They fancy themselves to be journalists with an extra layer of fact-checking that normal journalists dont bother with
You can tell fact checkers are worthless because they never challenge any official narrative… they only challenge those who challenge the official narrative.
True words. I don't think I've ever seen them challenge the narrative. That doesn't mean it hasn't happened, of course, but I will be doubtful.
You can tell fact checkers are worthless because they never challenge any official narrative… they only challenge those who challenge the official narrative.
true story.
Also, nobody asked them to be the arbitors ot truth. They simply assumed the role, and expect everyone else to believe whatever they say.
You can tell fact checkers are worthless because they never challenge any official narrative… they only challenge those who challenge the official narrative.
They fancy themselves to be journalists with an extra layer of fact-checking that normal journalists dont bother with
And to ADD to what you have eloquently put...the journo want to be ARBITERS OF THE TRUTH so that what is false is true and what is true is false...
We can thank Obummer for the conflab of intelligence on newsies part...
True words. I don't think I've ever seen them challenge the narrative. That doesn't mean it hasn't happened, of course, but I will be doubtful.
Exactly, well said.