The foundation of a church’s morality lies upon law. If there is a crime codified toward that law, it is perfectly fair to enforce it.
If that wasn’t possible, a “church” could name unprovoked, unwilling human sacrifice as a ritual, practice it, and hide behind “Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion.” We know that isn’t the case.
The line is going to be a fine one, but it can be walked. They are aiding and abeting an invasion. That’s not biblical, save as a curse. It’s against the foundation of our law, and therefore is unlawful. We just have to learn how to say it.
If any church says it is above the law, how did that come to be so, and what is the law, then?
Statutory, yes. Lawfulness, no.
The foundation of a church’s morality lies upon law. If there is a crime codified toward that law, it is perfectly fair to enforce it.
If that wasn’t possible, a “church” could name unprovoked, unwilling human sacrifice as a ritual, practice it, and hide behind “Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion.” We know that isn’t the case.
The line is going to be a fine one, but it can be walked. They are aiding and abeting an invasion. That’s not biblical, save as a curse. It’s against the foundation of our law, and therefore is unlawful. We just have to learn how to say it.
If any church says it is above the law, how did that come to be so, and what is the law, then?